Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 34184/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2012,15890
EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 34184/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,15890)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.04.2012 - 34184/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,15890)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. April 2012 - 34184/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,15890)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15890) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    GENNADIY MEDVEDEV v. RUSSIA

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
    No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance Free legal assistance) ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 38784/97

    MORRIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 34184/03
    Subsequently, in Morris v. the United Kingdom (no. 38784/97, § 89, ECHR 2002-I) the Court found no violation of Article 6 in relation to an offer of legal aid which was subject to a contribution of GBP 240, bearing in mind the applicant's net salary levels at the time.
  • EGMR, 24.05.1991 - 12744/87

    QUARANTA c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 34184/03
    It thus leaves to the Contracting States the choice of the means of ensuring that it is secured in their judicial systems, the Court's task being only to ascertain whether the method they have chosen is consistent with the requirements of a fair trial (see Quaranta v. Switzerland, 24 May 1991, § 30, Series A no. 205).
  • EGMR, 28.11.1978 - 6210/73

    Luedicke, Belkacem und Koç ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 34184/03
    The Court has considered in the context of Article 6 § 3 (e) of the Convention that the term "free" has a clear and determinate meaning: "without payment, gratuitous", "not costing or charging anything, given or furnished without cost or payment" (see Luedicke, Belkacem and Koç v. Germany, 28 November 1978, § 40, Series A no. 29).
  • EGMR, 25.09.1992 - 13611/88

    Klaus Croissant

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 34184/03
    As to Article 6 § 3 (c), the Court considered in Croissant v. Germany (25 September 1992, §§ 33 and 34, Series A no. 237-B) that the right to free legal assistance is not absolute; such assistance is to be provided only if the accused "[does] not [have] sufficient means to pay".
  • EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

    ARTICO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 34184/03
    In that connection it must be borne in mind that the Convention is intended to "guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective" and that assigning counsel does not in itself ensure the effectiveness of the assistance he or she may afford an accused (see Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37, and Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 38, Series A no. 275).
  • EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

    IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 34184/03
    In that connection it must be borne in mind that the Convention is intended to "guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective" and that assigning counsel does not in itself ensure the effectiveness of the assistance he or she may afford an accused (see Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37, and Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 38, Series A no. 275).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht