Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BAYDAR v. THE NETHERLANDS

  No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BAYDAR v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 04.07.2000 - 43149/98

  KOK c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 55385/14

  That is why the question of whether or not a court has failed to fulfil the obligation to provide reasons - deriving from Article 6 of the Convention - can only be determined in the light of the circumstances of the case (see Borovská and Forrai v. Slovakia, no. 48554/10, § 57, 25 November 2014; García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999-I; Kok v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 43149/98, 4 July 2000; and Ruiz Torija v. Spain, no. 18390/91, § 29, 9 December 1994).
• EGMR, 09.05.2017 - 29382/16

  ASTIKOS KAI PARATHERISTIKOS OIKODOMIKOS SYNETAIRISMOS AXIOMATIKON ET KARAGIORGOS …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 55385/14

  29382/16 and 489/17, § 47, 9 May 2017) the Court observed that the preliminary ruling requested by the applicant in that case would not have changed the conclusion reached by the Council of State of Greece since his appeal had been declared inadmissible due to the non-compliance with statutory requirements for the admissibility of appeal.
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 3989/07

  ULLENS DE SCHOOTEN ET REZABEK c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 55385/14

  Indeed, the right to a reasoned decision serves the general rule enshrined in the Convention which protects the individual from arbitrariness by demonstrating to the parties that they have been heard and obliges the courts to base their decision on objective reasons (see Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium, nos. 3989/07 and 38353/07, 20 September 2011, §§ 54-59).

 
• EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 65542/12

  STICHTING MOTHERS OF SREBRENICA AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 55385/14

  Furthermore, in the case of Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and others v. the Netherlands (no. 65542/12, § 173, ECHR 2013) the Court found that the summary reasoning used by the Supreme Court to refuse a request for a preliminary ruling was sufficient, pointing out that it followed already from a conclusion reached in another part of the Supreme Court's judgment that a request to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling was redundant.
• EGMR, 16.11.2010 - 926/05

  TAXQUET v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 55385/14

  In the judicial sphere, those principles serve to foster public confidence in an objective and transparent justice system, one of the foundations of a democratic society (see Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], 16 November 2010, no. 926/05, § 90 and the cases cited therein).
• EuGH, 15.03.2017 - C-3/16

  Aquino - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Unionsrecht - Dem Einzelnen verliehene …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 55385/14

  In the case of Lucio Cesare Aquino v. Belgische Staat (C-3/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:209), the CJEU gave judgment on 15 March 2017, stating, as far as relevant to the present case:.
• EuGH, 09.11.2010 - C-137/08

  VB Pénzügyi Lízing - Richtlinie 93/13/EWG - Missbräuchliche Klauseln in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 55385/14

  v. Ference Schneider (C-137/08, ECLI:EU:C:2010:659), the CJEU stated, as far as relevant to the present case:.
• EuGH, 09.10.2008 - C-404/07

  Katz - Polizeiliche und justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen - …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 55385/14

  In the case of György Katz v. István Roland Sós (C-404/07, ECLI:EU:C:2008:553), the CJEU delivered its judgment on 9 October 2008 which, as far as relevant to the present case, reads:.
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 55385/14

  The Court reiterates the relevant principles concerning exhaustion of domestic remedies set out in its judgment of 28 July 1999 in Selmouni v. France ([GC] no. 25803/94, §§ 74-77, ECHR 1999-V), including the principle that it is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one, available in theory and in practice at the relevant time.
• EuGH, 06.10.1982 - 283/81

  CILFIT / Ministero della Sanità

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 55385/14

  In the case of S.r.l. CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo S.p.a. v. Ministry of Health (C-283/81, ECLI:EU:C:1982:335), the CJEU received a request from the Italian Court of Cassation for a preliminary ruling.

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 15.04.2021 - C-561/19

  Generalanwalt Bobek: Der Gerichtshof sollte seine Rechtsprechung (die …

  90 Urteile des EGMR vom 24. April 2018, Baydar/Niederlande, CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD005538514, § 43).
• EGMR, 11.04.2019 - 50053/16

  Keine Verletzung von Artikel 6 Abs. 1 EMRK (Recht auf ein faires Verfahren) durch …

  Diese Grundsätze spiegeln sich in der Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofs wieder, die zuletzt in der Rechtssache Baydar ./. die Niederlande (Individualbeschwerde Nr. 55385/14, Rdnr. 42 bis 44, 24. April 2018), zusammengefasst wurde, bei der die Frage der hinreichenden Begründung der Ablehnung eines Antrags auf Vorlage an den EuGH geprüft wurde:.
• EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 25137/16

  SANOFI PASTEUR c. FRANCE

  La Convention ne garantit pas, comme tel, un droit à ce qu'une affaire soit renvoyée à titre préjudiciel par le juge interne devant la CJUE (voir Baydar c. Pays-Bas, no 55385/14, § 39, 24 avril 2018 ; voir aussi Ullens de Schooten et Rezabek, précité, § 57).

 
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 68475/10

  BLEY v. GERMANY

  August 2018; Baydar ./. die Niederlande, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 55385/14, Rdnrn. 39 bis 44, 24. April 2018; und H. ./. Deutschland (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 54193/07, 8. Dezember 2009).
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 45849/13

  ORLEN LIETUVA LTD. v. LITHUANIA

  Moreover, it is acceptable under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for national superior courts to dismiss a complaint by mere reference to the relevant legal provisions governing such complaints if the matter raises no fundamentally important legal issue (see Baydar v. the Netherlands, no. 55385/14, § 46, 24 April 2018).
• EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 43639/17

  BIO FARMLAND BETRIEBS S.R.L. c. ROUMANIE

  La Convention ne garantit pas, comme tel, un droit à ce qu'une affaire soit renvoyée à titre préjudiciel par le juge interne devant la CJUE (Baydar c. Pays-Bas, no 55385/14, § 39, 24 avril 2018 ; voir aussi Ullens de Schooten et Rezabek, précité, § 57).