Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1993,9984
EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89 (https://dejure.org/1993,9984)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.06.1993 - 14518/89 (https://dejure.org/1993,9984)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Juni 1993 - 14518/89 (https://dejure.org/1993,9984)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1993,9984) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 14+6 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Exception préliminaire rejetée (victime) Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement) Incompétence (grief nouveau) Violation de l'Art. 14+6-1 Non-violation de l'Art. 6-1 Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Dommage matériel - décision réservée ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN v. SWITZERLAND

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 14+6 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection rejected (victim) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) Lack of jurisdiction (new complaint) Violation of Art. 14+6-1 No violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Pecuniary damage - reserved Costs ...

  • Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte PDF

    (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (223)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

    LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
    [ï?ª] Note by the registry: 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43.
  • EGMR, 27.11.1992 - 13441/87

    OLSSON c. SUÈDE (N° 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
    That being so, the Court has no jurisdiction to consider it (see, as the most recent authority and mutatis mutandis, the Olsson v. Sweden (No. 2) judgment of 27 November 1992, Series A no. 250, pp.
  • EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85

    H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
    Admittedly, neither the letter nor the spirit of this provision prevents a person from waiving of his own free will, either expressly or tacitly, the entitlement to have his case heard in public, but any such waiver must be made in an unequivocal manner and must not run counter to any important public interest (see, among other authorities, the Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, p. 20, para. 66).
     
  • EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13023/87

    SALESI c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
    1 (art. 6-1) does apply in the field of social insurance, including even welfare assistance (see the Salesi v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-E, pp. 59-60, para. 19).
  • EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87

    PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
    In respect of this preliminary objection there is an estoppel, as the Government only raised it before the Commission after the decision on admissibility, whereas nothing prevented them from doing so earlier (see, as the most recent authority and mutatis mutandis, the Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 21, para. 45).
  • EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

    EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
    It considers, however, that the Federal Insurance Court remedied this shortcoming by requesting the Board to make all the documents available to the applicant - who was able, among other things, to make copies - and then forwarding the file to the applicant's lawyer (see, as the most recent authority, mutatis mutandis, the Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, paras. 34-39).
  • EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86

    LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
    The Court's task under the Convention is to ascertain whether the proceedings, considered as a whole, including the way in which the evidence was submitted, were fair (see, as the most recent authority and, mutatis mutandis, the Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 20, para. 43, and the Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment previously cited, pp. 34-35, para. 34).
  • EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79

    DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
    The advancement of the equality of the sexes is today a major goal in the member States of the Council of Europe and very weighty reasons would have to be put forward before such a difference of treatment could be regarded as compatible with the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, the Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 77, p. 38, para. 78).
  • EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11

    Gesichtsschleier-Verbot rechtens

    It reiterates in this connection that advancement of gender equality is today a major goal in the member States of the Council of Europe (ibid.; see also, among other authorities, Schuler- Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 67, Series A no. 263, and Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078/06, § 127, ECHR 2012).
  • EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 42393/98

    Verbot des Tragens eines islamischen Kopftuches während des Unterrichtens an …

    Deswegen können nur sehr gewichtige Gründe dazu führen, eine unterschiedliche Behandlung wegen des Geschlechts als mit der Konvention vereinbar anzusehen (…EGMR, 1985, Serie A., Bd. 94, S. 38 Nr. 78 - Abdulaziz, Cabales und Balkandali/Vereinigtes Königreich; EGMR, 1978, Serie A, Bd. 263, S. 21-22 Nr. 67 Schuler-Zgraggen/Schweiz).
  • EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 61838/10

    VUKOTA-BOJIC v. SWITZERLAND

    The Court notes at the outset that Article 6 of the Convention is applicable to proceedings concerning social security disputes (see Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 46, Series A no. 263).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht