Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DZIZIN v. UKRAINE

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 1086/02

  Article 35 § 1 also requires that the complaints intended to be brought subsequently before the Court should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic law, but not that recourse should be had to remedies which are inadequate or ineffective (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 58, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 26.05.2015 - 28943/06

  PIGUR v. UKRAINE

  Accordingly, he cannot be regarded as having exhausted the domestic remedies available to him under Ukrainian law (see, e.g., Polukhin v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 14278/07, 7 February 2012, Kukta v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 19443/03, 22 November 2005, and Dzizin v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 1086/02, 24 June 2003).
• EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 13909/06

  NAZARETIAN v. GEORGIA

  Thus, she could have requested redress for the damage done either by the allegedly arbitrary discontinuation of the enforcement proceedings in May 2001 or the bailiffs" refusal to locate the debtors" whereabouts (cf. Dzizin v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 1086/02, 24 June 2003; Kukta v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 19443/03, 22 November 2005).