Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 1542/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,21955) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BEÇAJ v. ALBANIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 34, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BEÇAJ v. ALBANIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 12.04.2005 - 36378/02
CHAMAÏEV ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE ET RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 1542/13
Having regard to the order of events as set out in paragraphs 18 to 20 above, the Court has decided to raise of its own motion the question of the respondent State's compliance with its obligation under Article 34 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 468, ECHR 2005-III), which reads, in so far as relevant, as follows:. - EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04
POPOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 1542/13
However, unlike previous cases, where an official from the local military prosecutor's office had paid the applicant a visit (Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078/06, § 162, ECHR 2012 (extracts)), or where the applicant had been directly contacted by State officials with regard to his complaints brought before the Court (Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 250, 13 July 2006), or where the applicant had been forced by State officials to write a statement withdrawing his application before the Court (Knyazev v. Russia, no. 25948/05, §§ 112-19, 8 November 2007), the present case concerned an isolated incident on the part of the authorities, in writing, to request the applicant to withdraw her application. - EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 25948/05
KNYAZEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 1542/13
However, unlike previous cases, where an official from the local military prosecutor's office had paid the applicant a visit (Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078/06, § 162, ECHR 2012 (extracts)), or where the applicant had been directly contacted by State officials with regard to his complaints brought before the Court (Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 250, 13 July 2006), or where the applicant had been forced by State officials to write a statement withdrawing his application before the Court (Knyazev v. Russia, no. 25948/05, §§ 112-19, 8 November 2007), the present case concerned an isolated incident on the part of the authorities, in writing, to request the applicant to withdraw her application.