Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MEHMET YAVUZ v. TURKEY

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-3 (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 47043/99
• EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99

  (see, among others, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 153, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

  JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99

  However, in the Court's view, neither the state of evidence nor the gravity of the charges can by themselves serve to justify long periods of detention pending trial (see, among others, Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207; Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A; Demirel v. Turkey, no. 39324/98, § 59, 28 January 2003; Vayiç v. Turkey, no. 18078/02, § 37, ECHR 2006-...; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 80-81, 26 July 2001; Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 94, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99

  Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty (see, among other authorities, W. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, p. 15, § 30; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110, ECHR 2000-XI).

 
• EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 33977/96

  ILIJKOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99

  However, in the Court's view, neither the state of evidence nor the gravity of the charges can by themselves serve to justify long periods of detention pending trial (see, among others, Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207; Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A; Demirel v. Turkey, no. 39324/98, § 59, 28 January 2003; Vayiç v. Turkey, no. 18078/02, § 37, ECHR 2006-...; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 80-81, 26 July 2001; Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 94, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 28.01.2003 - 39324/98

  DEMIREL c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99

  However, in the Court's view, neither the state of evidence nor the gravity of the charges can by themselves serve to justify long periods of detention pending trial (see, among others, Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207; Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A; Demirel v. Turkey, no. 39324/98, § 59, 28 January 2003; Vayiç v. Turkey, no. 18078/02, § 37, ECHR 2006-...; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 80-81, 26 July 2001; Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 94, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 13425/02

  MICHTA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99

  In this respect, the Court agrees that the severity of the sentence faced is a relevant element in the assessment of the risk of absconding (see Michta v. Poland, no. 13425/02, § 49, 4 May 2006).
• EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 18078/02

  VAYIC c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99

  However, in the Court's view, neither the state of evidence nor the gravity of the charges can by themselves serve to justify long periods of detention pending trial (see, among others, Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207; Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A; Demirel v. Turkey, no. 39324/98, § 59, 28 January 2003; Vayiç v. Turkey, no. 18078/02, § 37, ECHR 2006-...; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 80-81, 26 July 2001; Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 94, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 543/03

  McKAY c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99

  Until her or his conviction, the accused must be presumed innocent, and the purpose of the provision under consideration is essentially to require his provisional release once his continuing detention ceases to be reasonable (see McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 41, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86

  LETELLIER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99

  However, in the Court's view, neither the state of evidence nor the gravity of the charges can by themselves serve to justify long periods of detention pending trial (see, among others, Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207; Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A; Demirel v. Turkey, no. 39324/98, § 59, 28 January 2003; Vayiç v. Turkey, no. 18078/02, § 37, ECHR 2006-...; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 80-81, 26 July 2001; Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 94, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87

  TOMASI c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99

  However, in the Court's view, neither the state of evidence nor the gravity of the charges can by themselves serve to justify long periods of detention pending trial (see, among others, Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207; Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A; Demirel v. Turkey, no. 39324/98, § 59, 28 January 2003; Vayiç v. Turkey, no. 18078/02, § 37, ECHR 2006-...; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 80-81, 26 July 2001; Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 94, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

  Neumeister ./. Österreich
• EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88

  W. c. SUISSE