Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  B.S. c. ESPAGNE

  Art. 3, Art. 14, Art. 14+3 MRK
  Violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Article 3 - Enquête efficace) (Volet procédural) Violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Article 3 - Traitement dégradant Traitement inhumain) (Volet matériel) Violation de l'article 14+3 - ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  B.S. v. SPAIN

  Art. 3, Art. 14, Art. 14+3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 14+3 - ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

  B. S. gegen Spanien

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [FRE]

Wird zitiert von ... (19)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 31443/96

  BRONIOWSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08

  The Court considers that the present case is not one of those in which, exceptionally, with a view to helping the respondent State to fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court will seek to indicate the type of measure that might be taken in order to put an end to a systemic situation it has found to exist and in which it may propose various options and leave the choice of measure and its implementation to the discretion of the State concerned (see Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08

  Such an investigation, as with one under Article 2, should be capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see, regarding Article 2 of the Convention, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 161, Series A no. 324; Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, § 86, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I; Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 98, Reports 1998-VI; and Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, § 101, ECHR 2000-VIII).
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08

  The authorities must do what is reasonable in the circumstances to collect and secure the evidence, explore all practical means of discovering the truth and deliver fully reasoned, impartial and objective decisions, without omitting suspicious facts that may be indicative of racially induced violence (see, mutatis mutandis, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 160, ECHR 2005-VII).

 
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

  ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08

  With regard to the specific measures requested by the applicant, the Court reiterates that its judgments are essentially declaratory in nature and that, in general, it is primarily for the State concerned to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the means to be used in its domestic legal order in order to discharge its obligation under Article 46 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 202, ECHR 2004-II; Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 11261/03

  SONKAYA c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08

  Lastly, the Court reiterates that the onus is on the Government to produce evidence establishing facts that cast doubt on the victim's account (see Turan Cakir v. Belgium, no. 44256/06, § 54, 10 March 2009, and Sonkaya v. Turkey, no. 11261/03, § 25, 12 February 2008).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08

  The Court reiterates that the assessment of the minimum level of severity is, in the nature of things, relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08

  39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; and Brumarescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342/95, § 20, ECHR 2001).

• EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 43868/18

  WA BAILE c. SUISSE

  Elle affirme également que la Cour a jugé, en l'affaire B.S. c. Espagne (no 47159/08, 24 juillet 2012), qu'en restant en défaut d'examiner le grief selon lequel une motivation raciste était à l'origine des quatre arrestations dont la requérante avait fait l'objet de la part de la police, les autorités nationales n'avaient pas pris en considération la vulnérabilité spécifique résultant pour l'intéressée de sa qualité de femme africaine exerçant la prostitution, et avaient ainsi, en violation de l'article 14 de la Convention combiné avec son article 3, manqué à l'obligation qui leur incombait de prendre toutes les mesures possibles pour rechercher si une attitude discriminatoire avait pu ou non jouer un rôle dans les événements en cause.
• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 5418/15

  Bootsunglück vor Farmakonisi: Griechenland muss Flüchtlinge entschädigen

  À cet égard, elle tient toutefois à souligner que cette impossibilité découle en grande partie de l'absence d'une enquête approfondie et effective par les autorités nationales (B.S. c. Espagne, no 47159/08, § 55, 24 juillet 2012, Lopata c. Russie, no 72250/01, § 125, 13 juillet 2010, et Gharibashvili c. Géorgie, no 11830/03, § 57, 29 juillet 2008).
• EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 34085/17

  MUHAMMAD v. SPAIN

  The respondent State's obligation to investigate possible racist overtones to a violent act is an obligation to use best endeavours and not absolute (see B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 58, 24 July 2012).

  In short, and applying the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, which requires an in-depth and effective investigation of all incidents that may have a racist, xenophobic or other discriminatory motive (ECHR, [B.S.] v. Spain, no. 47159/08, 24 July 2012, or Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, [ECHR 2005-VII], all lines of inquiry have been exhausted to try to clarify the facts without it having been possible to obtain sufficient incriminating evidence to be able to bring criminal charges against the persons against whom the complaint was directed." (ibid.).

 
• EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  ABDU c. BULGARIE

  41138/98 and 64320/01, § 111, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts), and B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 41, 24 July 2012).

  In this connection, we do not think that the quotation (in paragraph 39 in fine of the judgment) from B.S. v. Spain (no. 47159/08, §§ 39-40, 24 July 2012) corroborates the conclusion reached by the majority because, unlike the acts complained of in B.S., the racist abuse denounced in the present case was not attributable to any State officials exercising supervision over the victim.

• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 73235/12

  IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  This is a question to be decided in each case in the light of its facts and the nature of the allegations made (see Bekos and Koutropoulos v. Greece, no. 15250/02, § 70, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts); B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, §§ 59-63, 24 July 2012; and compare with Begheluri and Others v. Georgia, no. 28490/02, §§ 171-79, 7 October 2014).
• EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 50231/13

  SABALIC v. CROATIA

  Discriminatory remarks and racist insults must in any event be considered as an aggravating factor when considering a given instance of ill-treatment in the light of Article 3 (see B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 40, 24 July 2012; Abdu v. Bulgaria, no. 26827/08, § 23, 11 March 2014; and Identoba and Others v. Georgia, no. 73235/12, § 65, 12 May 2015).

  Owing to the interplay of Articles 3 and 14 of the Convention in the context of violence motivated by discrimination, issues such as those raised by the present case may fall to be examined under Article 3 alone, with no separate issue arising under Article 14, or may require examination of Article 3 in conjunction with Article 14. This is a question to be decided in each case depending on the facts and the nature of the allegations made (see, for example, B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 59, 24 July 2012, and Skorjanec, cited above, § 37).

• EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 15529/12

  BALÁZS v. HUNGARY

  41138/98 and 64320/01, § 111, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts); and B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 41, 24 July 2012).

  This is a question to be decided in each case depending on the facts and the nature of the allegations made (see Abdu v. Bulgaria, cited above, § 31; B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, §§ 59-63, 24 July 2012; Bekos and Koutropoulos, cited above, § 70).

• EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  R.B. v. HUNGARY

  41138/98 and 64320/01, § 111, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts), and B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 41, 24 July 2012).
• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 1653/13

  Spanien verurteilt: ETA-Terroristen unmenschlich behandelt

  Cette enquête, à l'instar de celle résultant de l'article 2, doit pouvoir mener à l'identification et, le cas échéant, à la punition des responsables (voir Martinez Sala et autres, précité, § 156, San Argimiro Isasa c. Espagne, no 2507/07, § 34, 28 septembre 2010, Beristain Ukar c. Espagne, no 40351/05, § 28, 8 mars 2011, B.S. c. Espagne, no 47159/08, § 40, 24 juillet 2012, Otamendi Egiguren, précité, § 38, Etxebarria Caballero, précité, § 43, Ataun Rojo, précité, § 34, Arratibel Garciandia, précité, § 35, et, pour un arrêt récent, Beortegui Martinez, précité, § 37).
• EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 12060/12

  M.C. AND A.C. v. ROMANIA

  This is a question to be decided in each case in the light of its facts and the nature of the allegations made (see Ciorcan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29414/09 and 44841/09, § 158, 27 January 2015; Identoba and Others v. Georgia, no. 73235/12, §§ 63 and 64, 12 May 2015; Bekos and Koutropoulos v. Greece, no. 15250/02, § 70, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts); B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, §§ 59-63, 24 July 2012; and compare with Begheluri and Others v. Georgia, no. 28490/02, §§ 171-79, 7 October 2014).
• EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 38963/08

  SOCIEDAD ANÓNIMA DEL UCIEZA c. ESPAGNE
• EGMR, 11.04.2019 - 38089/12

  SARWARI ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 24626/09

  X v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 26.04.2018 - 42660/11

  ANDERSEN c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 14800/18

  BALKASI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 7224/11

  AGHDGOMELASHVILI AND JAPARIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 23914/15

  GENDERDOC-M AND M.D. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 70555/10

  ION BALASOIU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 26.01.2023 - 60990/14

  B.Y. c. GRÈCE