Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.09.2002 - 42295/98   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2002,32893
EGMR, 24.09.2002 - 42295/98 (https://dejure.org/2002,32893)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.09.2002 - 42295/98 (https://dejure.org/2002,32893)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. September 2002 - 42295/98 (https://dejure.org/2002,32893)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,32893) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    NERVA ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
    Non-violation de P1-1 non-violation de l'art. 14+P1-1 (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    NERVA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
    No violation of P1-1 No violation of Art. 14+P1-1 (englisch)

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (8)

  • EGMR, 07.02.2013 - 16574/08

    FABRIS c. FRANCE

    However, the hope of recognition of the survival of an old property right which it has long been impossible to exercise effectively cannot be considered as a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, nor can a conditional claim which lapses as a result of the non-fulfilment of the condition (see the recapitulation of the relevant principles in Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII, with further references to the Commission's case-law; see also Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 85, ECHR 2001-VIII; Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 43, ECHR 2002-VIII; and Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no. 44277/98, § 32, 24 June 2003).
  • EGMR, 29.07.2010 - 8549/06

    STRELTSOV AND OTHER "NOVOCHERKASSK MILITARY PENSIONERS" v. RUSSIA

    Insofar as the complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 are concerned, the Court on several occasions continued the examination of cases involving pecuniary claims that were transferable to the deceased applicant's heirs (see, for example, Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 33, ECHR 2002-VIII).
  • EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 44277/98

    STRETCH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    By way of contrast, the hope of recognition of the survival of an old property right which it has long been impossible to exercise effectively cannot be considered as a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, nor can a conditional claim which lapses as a result of the non-fulfilment of the condition (see the recapitulation of the relevant principles in Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, 13 December 2000, ECHR 2000-XII, with further references, in particular to the Commission's case-law; also Prince Hans-Adam II v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, ECHR 2001-VIII, § 85, and Nerva v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, judgment of 24 September 2002, § 43).
  • EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 15973/90

    LORDOS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    42908/98, 44038/98, 44816/98 and 7319/02, § 85, 9 June 2005; and Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 33, ECHR 2002-VIII).
  • EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 30733/08

    HÜLYA EBRU DEMIREL v. TURKEY

    In examining this issue, the Court must bear in mind that where a high court refuses to accept a case on the basis that the legal grounds for such a case are not made out, very limited reasoning may satisfy the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Nerva v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42295/98, 11 July 2000; Marini v. Albania, no. 3738/02, § 106, ECHR 2007-XIV (extracts); and, Bachowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 32463/06, ECHR 2010 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 2982/05

    SHURYGINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    The Court has also found in a number of cases relating to claims under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that applications concerning property rights are, in principle, transferable to heirs (see, among other authorities, Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 33, ECHR 2002-VIII, and Sobelin and Others v. Russia, nos. 30672/03 et al., §§ 43-45, 3 May 2007, for issues relating to both Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention).
  • EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91

    SOPHIA ANDREOU v. TURKEY

    For the purposes of the instant case, the Court is prepared to accept that the applicant's husband and children can pursue the application initially brought by Mrs Sophia Andreou (see, mutatis mutandis, Kirilova and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 42908/98, 44038/98, 44816/98 and 7319/02, § 85, 9 June 2005, and Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 33, ECHR 2002-VIII).
  • EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 22479/05

    AVYIDI c. TURQUIE

    Il en va de même d'une créance conditionnelle s'éteignant du fait de la non-réalisation de la condition (Malhous c. République tchèque (déc.), no 33071/96, CEDH 2000-XII, Prince Hans-Adam II c. Allemagne [GC], no 42527/98, § 85, CEDH 2001-VIII, et Nerva c. Royaume-Uni, no 42295/98, § 43, 24 septembre 2002).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht