Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.09.2009 - 15413/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,67367) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZENIN v. RUSSIA
Art. 5 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2009 - 15413/03
The purpose of the exhaustion requirement is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2009 - 15413/03
The rule in Article 35 § 1 is based on the assumption that there is an effective domestic remedy available in respect of the alleged breach of an individual's Convention rights (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
- EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 20364/05
ALEKSANDR SOKOLOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 30251/03
ROMAN KARASEV v. RUSSIA
Where, therefore, an applicant avails himself of an apparently existing remedy and only subsequently becomes aware of circumstances which render the remedy ineffective, it may be appropriate for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 to calculate the six-month time-limit from the date when the applicant first became or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Keenan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27229/95, 22 May 1998, and Zenin v. Russia (dec.), no. 15413/03, 24 September 2009).