Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 46090/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,25333) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SARDÓN ALVIRA v. SPAIN
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Preliminary objection joined to merits (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae) Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Civil rights and obligations Criminal charge Fair hearing) ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Sardón Alvira v. Spain
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00
Andrejeva ./. Lettland
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 46090/10
In this connection, the Government cited the Court's case-law in the case of Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC] (no. 55707/00, § 96, ECHR 2009), in which the Court reiterated the scope of the guarantees of the civil limb of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, contending that the only legal issue at stake in the instant case was whether the applicant had been provided with the opportunity, from a substantive point of view, of submitting arguments regarding his civil liability in the case.Nevertheless, certain principles concerning the notion of a "fair hearing" in cases regarding civil rights and obligations emerge from the Court's case-law (see Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, §§ 96-98, ECHR 2009).
- EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79
Öztürk ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 46090/10
According to its established case-law there are three criteria to be taken into account when deciding whether a person has been "charged with a criminal offence" for the purposes of Article 6, namely the qualification of the act or omission in the legal system of the State concerned, the nature of the offence, and the nature and degree of severity of the penalty (see, amongst other authorities, Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 82, Series A no. 22, and Öztürk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, § 50, Series A no. 73). - EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88
DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 46090/10
Thus, although these provisions have a certain relevance outside the strict confines of criminal law, the Contracting States have greater latitude when dealing with civil cases concerning civil rights and obligations than they have when dealing with criminal cases (see Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 32, Series A no. 274). - EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00
GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 46090/10
It also includes the principle of equality of arms, which requires a "fair balance" between the parties: each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent or opponents (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 56, ECHR 2004-III).