Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VUCINA v. CROATIA

  Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  VUCINA v. CROATIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 58955/13

  The Court refers to the general principles concerning the broad concept of private life (see Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, § 95, 25 September 2018), including aspects relating to personal identity, such as a person's name and photograph, under Article 8, and freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention, as well as the criteria relevant for the balancing exercise between the two rights set out in Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) ([GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 95-113, ECHR 2012).

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 59, ECHR 2012]; Gurgenidze v. Georgia, no. 71678/01, §§ 55-60, 17 October 2006; and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France, no. 71111/01, § 48, 14 June 2007).

• EGMR, 23.07.2009 - 12268/03

  HACHETTE FILIPACCHI ASSOCIES (ICI PARIS) c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 58955/13

  66910/01 and 71612/01, 1 July 2003, and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France (ICI PARIS), no. 12268/03, § 40, 23 July 2009), are often obtained in a climate of continual harassment which may induce in the person concerned a very strong sense of intrusion into their private life or even of persecution (see Von Hannover, cited above, § 59).
• EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 71612/01

  SOCIETE PRISMA PRESSE contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 58955/13

  66910/01 and 71612/01, 1 July 2003, and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France (ICI PARIS), no. 12268/03, § 40, 23 July 2009), are often obtained in a climate of continual harassment which may induce in the person concerned a very strong sense of intrusion into their private life or even of persecution (see Von Hannover, cited above, § 59).

 
• EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00

  BLECIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 58955/13

  Thus, given that the compatibility ratione materiae is an issue which the Court must examine on its own motion (see, for instance, Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III, and Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503/97, § 58, ECHR 2008), the Court must first determine whether the impugned situation affecting the applicant's private life attained the requisite level of seriousness under Article 8 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 66910/01

  SOCIETE PRISMA PRESS contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 58955/13

  66910/01 and 71612/01, 1 July 2003, and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France (ICI PARIS), no. 12268/03, § 40, 23 July 2009), are often obtained in a climate of continual harassment which may induce in the person concerned a very strong sense of intrusion into their private life or even of persecution (see Von Hannover, cited above, § 59).
• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11

  DENISOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 58955/13

  The Court refers to the general principles concerning the broad concept of private life (see Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, § 95, 25 September 2018), including aspects relating to personal identity, such as a person's name and photograph, under Article 8, and freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention, as well as the criteria relevant for the balancing exercise between the two rights set out in Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) ([GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 95-113, ECHR 2012).

• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 81292/17

  CHOCHOLÁC v. SLOVAKIA

  Whether or not that level of seriousness was attained will depend on the circumstances of the particular case (see Vucina v. Croatia, no. 58955/13, § 31, 24 September 2019).