Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.10.2006 - 4123/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,62164) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HUDEC v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 17, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2006 - 4123/02
It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2006 - 4123/02
However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2006 - 4123/02
Yet it cannot be said that detention in itself raises an issue under Article 3 of the Convention (see, for example, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI).
- EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72
SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2006 - 4123/02
It considers that the information before it is insufficient for it to find that the applicant's right to respect for his correspondence under Article 8 of the Convention has been interfered with and, even assuming it has been, that such interference was incompatible with the ordinary and reasonable requirements of imprisonment (see Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, pp. 37-38, § 98). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2006 - 4123/02
Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52). - EGMR, 24.06.1982 - 7906/77
VAN DROOGENBROECK v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2006 - 4123/02
His detention was justified at the outset by the original conviction and appeal proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, the Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium judgment of 24 June 1982, Series A no. 50, pp. 21-22, §§ 39-40) and, as such, raises no questions under that provision.