Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.11.1998 - 37439/97   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1998,32435
EGMR, 24.11.1998 - 37439/97 (https://dejure.org/1998,32435)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.11.1998 - 37439/97 (https://dejure.org/1998,32435)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. November 1998 - 37439/97 (https://dejure.org/1998,32435)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,32435) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79

    PIERSACK v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1998 - 37439/97
    The Court recalls that, in order to determine whether a tribunal can be considered to be independent, it must have regard to the manner of appointment of its members, the duration of their term of office, the existence of guarantees against outside pressures and the question whether the body presents an appearance of independence (Eur. Court HR, Findlay v. United Kingdom judgment of 25 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I, p. 281, para 73. In order to determine whether a tribunal can be considered to be impartial, the Court must adopt a subjective and an objective approach. The first involves endeavouring to ascertain the personal conviction of the judges in the particular case, while the second aims at determining whether the judges offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect. The personal impartiality of a judge must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary (Eur. Court HR, Piersack v. Belgium judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53, p. 14, para. 30).
  • EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

    SCHENK c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1998 - 37439/97
    As regards the applicant's complaint concerning the application of national law, the Court recalls that it is not competent to deal with applications alleging that errors of national law have been committed by the national courts, except where it considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention (Eur. Court HR, Schenk v. Switzerland judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, para. 45).
  • EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86

    ASCH v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.1998 - 37439/97
    The Court's task is to establish whether the evidence for and against the accused was presented in such a way as to ensure a fair trial (see Eur. Court HR, Asch v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, para. 26).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht