Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 32214/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,68119) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHANNON v. LATVIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 41 MRK
No violation of Art. 5-1-c Violation of Art. 5-4 No violation of Art. 5-4 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 32214/03
- EGMR, 13.04.2016 - 32214/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00
ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 32214/03
According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 64, ECHR 2004-IV). - EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 66820/01
SVIPSTA c. LETTONIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 32214/03
However, this provision was very rarely complied with by the Latvian courts (see Svipsta v. Latvia, no. 66820/01, § 62, ECHR 2006-III (extracts)). - EGMR, 07.02.2008 - 14258/03
PARIZOV v.
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 32214/03
The Court points out that under Rule 60 of the Rules of Court "the applicant must submit itemised particulars of all claims, together with any relevant supporting documents failing which the Chamber may reject the claim in whole or in part" (see Parizov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 14258/03, § 71, 7 February 2008).