Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 4637/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,68971) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95
DALBAN v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 4637/02
Without denying the provocative value of these expressions, the Court reiterates that journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation and cannot be regarded as overstepping the limits set by the Convention and the case-law on freedom of the press (see Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 49, ECHR 1999-VI). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 28871/95
CONSTANTINESCU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 4637/02
In similar circumstances to those of the present case, the Court has established that where an appellate court is called upon to examine a case as to the facts and the law and to make a full assessment of the question of the applicant's guilt or innocence, it cannot, as a matter of fair trial, properly determine those issues without a direct assessment of the evidence given in person by the accused (see Constantinescu v. Romania, no. 28871/95, § 55, ECHR 2000-VIII). - EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01
STEEL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 4637/02
Furthermore, the Court cannot attach weight to the County Court's finding that the applicant had acted in bad faith, in so far as the criminal proceedings lacked the requirements of a fair trial (see paragraph 32 above; Folea v. Romania, no. 34434/02, § 42, 14 October 2008; and, mutatis mutandis, Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 95, ECHR 2005-II).
- EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 20893/03
JULY AND SARL LIBERATION v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 4637/02
The Court refers to the general principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of expression, in particular the protection afforded to journalists who cover matters of public concern and that afforded to civil servants' reputations (see, among the more recent judgments, Busuioc v. Moldova, no. 61513/00, §§ 56-62, 21 December 2004; Stângu and Scutelnicu, cited above, §§ 40-42 and 52-53; and July and Sarl Libération v. France, no. 20893/03, §§ 60-64, ECHR 2008-... (extracts)). - EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 34434/02
FOLEA c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 4637/02
Furthermore, the Court cannot attach weight to the County Court's finding that the applicant had acted in bad faith, in so far as the criminal proceedings lacked the requirements of a fair trial (see paragraph 32 above; Folea v. Romania, no. 34434/02, § 42, 14 October 2008; and, mutatis mutandis, Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 95, ECHR 2005-II). - EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 14939/03
Sergeï Zolotoukhine ./. Russland
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 4637/02
In order to establish whether a person has been criminally convicted within the autonomous meaning of the Convention the Court applies the so-called "Engel criteria", most recently reaffirmed in Jussila v. Finland ([GC], no. 73053/01, §§ 30-31, ECHR 2006-XIV) and Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 14939/03, § 53, 10 February 2009). - EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79
Öztürk ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 4637/02
As for the nature of the offence, the Court notes that the relevant provisions of the Criminal Code were directed towards all citizens rather than towards a group possessing special status and that the offence in question made the perpetrator liable to penalties intended to punish and deter (see Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665/98 and 40086/98, § 104, ECHR 2003-X; Öztürk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, § 52, Series A no. 73; Anghel v. Romania, no. 28183/03, § 51, 4 October 2007; and Zolotukhin, cited above, § 55).
- EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 29672/05
CIUVICA c. ROUMANIE
La Cour souligne qu'elle a déjà eu l'occasion de se prononcer à de nombreuses reprises sur des affaires visant des accusations de collaboration avec la Securitate (voir Tudor c. Roumanie (no 1) (déc.), no 6928/04, 15 juin 2006 ; Petrina c. Roumanie, no 78060/01, 14 octobre 2008 ; Ieremeiov c. Roumanie (no 2), no 4637/02, 24 novembre 2009 ; Andreescu c. Roumanie, no 19452/02, 8 juin 2010). - EGMR, 03.10.2023 - 56812/17
GAETAN c. ROUMANIE
La Cour considère qu'il n'y a aucune raison de s'écarter de l'appréciation des juridictions internes (voir Ieremeiov c. Roumanie (no 2), no 4637/02, § 42, 24 novembre 2009, concernant également des imputations de collaboration d'une personne avec l'ancienne Securitate).