Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GREBENC v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Grebenc v. Slovenia

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2011 - 22174/06

  The reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2011 - 22174/06

  Thus the effect of this provision is to require the existence of an effective remedy to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" and to grant appropriate relief (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 06.04.2006 - 10288/02

  REPAS v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2011 - 22174/06

  In the circumstances of the present case and in the light of the criteria laid down in its case-law (see, mutatis mutandis, Repas v. Slovenia, no. 10288/02, § 23, 6 April 2006; Kotnik v. Slovenia, no. 17330/02, §§ 15-17; Rogelj v. Slovenia, no. 21415/02, §§ 68-70) the Court considers that length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.

 
• EGMR, 13.04.2006 - 17330/02

  KOTNIK v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2011 - 22174/06

  In the circumstances of the present case and in the light of the criteria laid down in its case-law (see, mutatis mutandis, Repas v. Slovenia, no. 10288/02, § 23, 6 April 2006; Kotnik v. Slovenia, no. 17330/02, §§ 15-17; Rogelj v. Slovenia, no. 21415/02, §§ 68-70) the Court considers that length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
• EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 21415/02

  ROGELJ v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2011 - 22174/06

  In the circumstances of the present case and in the light of the criteria laid down in its case-law (see, mutatis mutandis, Repas v. Slovenia, no. 10288/02, § 23, 6 April 2006; Kotnik v. Slovenia, no. 17330/02, §§ 15-17; Rogelj v. Slovenia, no. 21415/02, §§ 68-70) the Court considers that length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
• EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 20965/03

  RIBIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2011 - 22174/06

  The Court further observes that the present applications are similar to the case of Ribic v. Slovenia (no.20965/03, 19 October 2010), in which the Court found that that the legal remedies at the applicant's disposal were ineffective (ibid., §§ 37-42).
• EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

  Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2011 - 22174/06

  The Court recalls that Article 13 of the Convention guarantees an "effective remedy before a national authority" to everyone who claims that his rights and freedoms under the Convention have been violated (see Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 64, Series A no. 28).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2011 - 22174/06

  However, Article 13 requires a remedy in domestic law only in respect of an alleged grievance which is an arguable one in terms of the Convention (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131).