Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MUSIAL v. POLAND

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MUSIAL v. POLAND

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 11.12.2014 - 42184/09

  KUSHNIR v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 27426/13

  The authorities must also ensure that where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy that seeks, to the extent possible, to cure the detainee's diseases or to avoid aggravating them, rather than to address them on a symptomatic basis (see Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 114, 29 November 2007; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005; Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006; Mikalauskas v. Malta, no. 4458/10, § 63, 23 July 2013; Pozaic v. Croatia, no. 5901/13, § 53, 4 December 2014; and Kushnir v. Ukraine, no. 42184/09, § 135, 11 December 2014).
• EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 5901/13

  POZAIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 27426/13

  The authorities must also ensure that where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy that seeks, to the extent possible, to cure the detainee's diseases or to avoid aggravating them, rather than to address them on a symptomatic basis (see Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 114, 29 November 2007; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005; Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006; Mikalauskas v. Malta, no. 4458/10, § 63, 23 July 2013; Pozaic v. Croatia, no. 5901/13, § 53, 4 December 2014; and Kushnir v. Ukraine, no. 42184/09, § 135, 11 December 2014).
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 4458/10

  MIKALAUSKAS v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 27426/13

  The authorities must also ensure that where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy that seeks, to the extent possible, to cure the detainee's diseases or to avoid aggravating them, rather than to address them on a symptomatic basis (see Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 114, 29 November 2007; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005; Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006; Mikalauskas v. Malta, no. 4458/10, § 63, 23 July 2013; Pozaic v. Croatia, no. 5901/13, § 53, 4 December 2014; and Kushnir v. Ukraine, no. 42184/09, § 135, 11 December 2014).

 
• EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05

  SARBAN v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 27426/13

  The authorities must also ensure that where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy that seeks, to the extent possible, to cure the detainee's diseases or to avoid aggravating them, rather than to address them on a symptomatic basis (see Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 114, 29 November 2007; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005; Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006; Mikalauskas v. Malta, no. 4458/10, § 63, 23 July 2013; Pozaic v. Croatia, no. 5901/13, § 53, 4 December 2014; and Kushnir v. Ukraine, no. 42184/09, § 135, 11 December 2014).
• EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01

  MELNIK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 27426/13

  There are three particular elements to be considered in relation to the compatibility of the applicant's health with his stay in detention: (a) the medical condition of the prisoner, (b) the adequacy of the medical assistance and care provided in detention and (c) the advisability of maintaining the detention measure in view of the state of health of the applicant (see Mouisel v. France, cited above, §§ 40-42; Sakkopoulos v. Greece, no. 61828/00, § 39, 15 January 2004; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, § 94, 28 March 2006).
• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04

  POPOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 27426/13

  The authorities must also ensure that where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy that seeks, to the extent possible, to cure the detainee's diseases or to avoid aggravating them, rather than to address them on a symptomatic basis (see Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 114, 29 November 2007; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005; Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006; Mikalauskas v. Malta, no. 4458/10, § 63, 23 July 2013; Pozaic v. Croatia, no. 5901/13, § 53, 4 December 2014; and Kushnir v. Ukraine, no. 42184/09, § 135, 11 December 2014).
• EGMR, 15.01.2004 - 61828/00

  SAKKOPOULOS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 27426/13

  There are three particular elements to be considered in relation to the compatibility of the applicant's health with his stay in detention: (a) the medical condition of the prisoner, (b) the adequacy of the medical assistance and care provided in detention and (c) the advisability of maintaining the detention measure in view of the state of health of the applicant (see Mouisel v. France, cited above, §§ 40-42; Sakkopoulos v. Greece, no. 61828/00, § 39, 15 January 2004; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, § 94, 28 March 2006).