Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 25.02.2003 - 77746/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,37865) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KROENITZ v. POLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to first set of proceedings Not necessary to examine P1-1 with regard to first set of proceedings Inadmissible under Art. 6-1 and P1-1 with regard to second set of proceedings (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 30.04.2002 - 77746/01
- EGMR, 25.02.2003 - 77746/01
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.02.2003 - 77746/01
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria established by its case-law, particularly the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII and Humen v. Poland § 60 cited above). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.02.2003 - 77746/01
Consequently, there is no justification for making any award to her under that head (see, mutatis mutandis, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 164, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95
Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.02.2003 - 77746/01
The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank to which should be added three percentage points (see Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 124, to be published in ECHR 2002 - ).
- EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 24523/08
UZAROWICZ v. POLAND
Having regard to its finding under Article 6 § 1 (see paragraphs 44-47 above), the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine whether, in this case, there has also been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Zanghì v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 194-C, p. 47, § 23; Kroenitz v. Poland, no. 77746/01, § 37, 25 February 2003).