Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 25.03.2004 - 24077/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,49481) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
Natalya GERASIMOVA v. RUSSIA
Art. 3, Art. 4, Art. 4 Abs. 2, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 8, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 25.03.2004 - 24077/02
- EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 24077/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 33394/96
PRICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2004 - 24077/02
As to the complaint under Article 3, the absolute prohibition of degrading or inhuman treatment enshrined in that Convention provision applies when a "minimum level of severity is attained" (see Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII). - EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 48758/99
VOLKOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2004 - 24077/02
While the Court sees no reason to doubt the applicant's contention that her eviction and resettlement were a source of significant distress, it considers that this situation would not cause the applicant suffering or humiliation of such intensity as to constitute "degrading" treatment within the meaning of Article 3 (cf., e.g., Saliba v. Malta (dec.), no. 4251/02, 27 November 2003; Volkova v. Russia (dec.), no. 48758/99, 18 November 2003). - EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2004 - 24077/02
The Court next recalls that not only must a measure depriving a person of her property pursue, on the facts as well as in principle, a legitimate aim "in the public interest", but there must also be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised (see Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, § 120) or, in other words, the "fair balance" must be struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 26, § 69). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2004 - 24077/02
The Court next recalls that not only must a measure depriving a person of her property pursue, on the facts as well as in principle, a legitimate aim "in the public interest", but there must also be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised (see Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, § 120) or, in other words, the "fair balance" must be struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 26, § 69).