Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2021,6582
EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18 (https://dejure.org/2021,6582)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25.03.2021 - 1864/18 (https://dejure.org/2021,6582)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25. März 2021 - 1864/18 (https://dejure.org/2021,6582)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,6582) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MATALAS v. GREECE

    Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (12)Neu Zitiert selbst (25)

  • EGMR, 22.11.2017 - 1799/07

    ZIEMBINSKI CONTRE LA POLOGNE (N° 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18
    21279/02 and 36448/02, § 47, ECHR 2007-IV; and Ziembinski v. Poland (no. 2), no. 1799/07, § 46, 5 July 2016), a criminal conviction is a serious sanction, having regard to the existence of other means of intervention and rebuttal, particularly through civil remedies (see Frisk and Jensen v. Denmark, no. 19657/12, § 77, 5 December 2017).
  • EGMR - 28473/12 (anhängig)

    KREJZOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18
    The Court is mindful of the fundamentally subsidiary role of the Convention system (see Dubská and Krejzová v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12, § 175, ECHR 2016).
  • EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 29032/95

    FELDEK c. SLOVAQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18
    As a general rule, the Court considers that the necessity of a link between a value judgment and its supporting facts may vary from case to case according to the specific circumstances (see De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 47, Reports 1997-I, and Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 86, ECHR 2001-VIII).
  • EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96

    CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18
    The Court has emphasised on many occasions that the imposition of a prison sentence in defamation cases will be compatible with freedom of expression, as guaranteed by Article 10 of the Convention, only in exceptional circumstances - notably where other fundamental rights have been seriously impaired, as, for example, in the case of hate speech or incitement to violence (see, mutatis mutandis, Cumpana and Mazare v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 115, ECHR 2004-XI, and Mika, cited above, § 33).
  • EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00

    ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18
    According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 64, ECHR 2004-IV).
  • EGMR, 02.05.2000 - 26132/95

    BERGENS TIDENDE ET AUTRES c. NORVEGE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18
    Accordingly, the accusations attained a level of seriousness sufficient to harm L.P."s rights under Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Bergens Tidende and Others v. Norway, no. 26132/95, § 51, ECHR 2000-IV, and Kanellopoulou v. Greece, no. 28504/05, § 38, 11 October 2007, both of which concerned accusations made against doctors).
  • EGMR, 11.10.2007 - 28504/05

    KANELLOPOULOU c. GRECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18
    Accordingly, the accusations attained a level of seriousness sufficient to harm L.P."s rights under Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Bergens Tidende and Others v. Norway, no. 26132/95, § 51, ECHR 2000-IV, and Kanellopoulou v. Greece, no. 28504/05, § 38, 11 October 2007, both of which concerned accusations made against doctors).
  • EGMR, 09.03.2017 - 55135/10

    ATHANASIOS MAKRIS c. GRÈCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18
    Lastly, the nature and severity of the penalty imposed are factors to be taken into account when assessing the proportionality of the interference (see Katrami v. Greece, no. 19331/05, § 38, 6 December 2007; Mika v. Greece, no. 10347/10, § 32, 19 December 2013; and Athanasios Makris v. Greece, no. 55135/10, § 38, 9 March 2017).
  • EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 10347/10

    MIKA c. GRÈCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18
    Lastly, the nature and severity of the penalty imposed are factors to be taken into account when assessing the proportionality of the interference (see Katrami v. Greece, no. 19331/05, § 38, 6 December 2007; Mika v. Greece, no. 10347/10, § 32, 19 December 2013; and Athanasios Makris v. Greece, no. 55135/10, § 38, 9 March 2017).
  • EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 19331/05

    KATRAMI c. GRECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 1864/18
    Lastly, the nature and severity of the penalty imposed are factors to be taken into account when assessing the proportionality of the interference (see Katrami v. Greece, no. 19331/05, § 38, 6 December 2007; Mika v. Greece, no. 10347/10, § 32, 19 December 2013; and Athanasios Makris v. Greece, no. 55135/10, § 38, 9 March 2017).
  • EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 25716/94

    JANOWSKI v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 12148/03

    SANCHEZ CARDENAS v. NORWAY

  • EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02

    LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 17155/03

    COUTANT v. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 19657/12

    FRISK AND JENSEN v. DENMARK

  • EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85

    CASTELLS v. SPAIN

  • EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 63767/00

    PUZINAS v. LITHUANIA (No. 2)

  • EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 28070/06

    A. v. NORWAY

  • EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 59330/00
  • EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 31611/96

    NIKULA c. FINLANDE

  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

    HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

    FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06

    PALOMO SÁNCHEZ ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  • EGMR, 13.11.2019 - 39401/04

    MGN LIMITED AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 51000/11

    RADOBULJAC CONTRE LA CROATIE

  • EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 37712/13

    POGHOSYAN v. ARMENIA

    However, the role of the domestic courts in such proceedings does not include indicating to the defendant what style he should have adopted in exercising his right to criticism, however caustic the remarks in question may have been (see, mutatis mutandis, Matalas v. Greece, no. 1864/18, § 50, 25 March 2021).
  • EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 14157/18

    JARRE c. FRANCE

    Le grief dont on entend saisir la Cour doit d'abord être soulevé, au moins en substance, dans les formes et délais prescrits par le droit interne, devant ces mêmes juridictions nationales appropriées (voir, parmi d'autres, Cardot c. France, 19 mars 1991, § 34, série A no 200, Azinas c. Chypre [GC], no 56679/00, § 38, CEDH 2004-III, et Matalas c. Grèce, no 1864/18, § 25, 25 mars 2021).
  • EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 48340/20

    DEDE c. TÜRKIYE

    La Cour constate donc l'impact du courriel litigieux sur l'employeur et dans le lieu de travail devait être très limité (voir, mutatis mutandis, Matalas c. Grèce, no 1864/18, § 55, 25 mars 2021).
  • EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 59402/14

    STRAUME v. LATVIA

    With respect to the argument about the potential damage that could be caused by disseminating the information included in the letter, the Court points out that the letter was only sent to the State officials that oversaw the employer - a State owned company - and was not published or otherwise distributed to the wider public (compare Matalas v. Greece, no. 1864/18, § 55, 25 March 2021).
  • EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 20725/20

    ALLÉE c. FRANCE

    Les principes généraux et la méthodologie de l'examen 45. Pour les principes généraux permettant d'apprécier la nécessité d'une ingérence donnée dans l'exercice de la liberté d'expression dans le contexte de diffamation, il est renvoyé aux arrêts Morice c. France ([GC], no 29369/10, §§ 124-127, CEDH 2015), et, plus récemment, Matalas c. Grèce (no 1864/18, §§ 38-44, 25 mars 2021, et les références y citées).
  • EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 84048/17

    EIGIRDAS AND VĮ "DEMOKRATIJOS PLETROS FONDAS" v. LITHUANIA

    Even assuming that his reputation did suffer because of that article, the Court doubts that the consequences suffered by him were sufficiently serious to override the public's interest in receiving the information contained in it (see, mutatis mutandis, Tiriac v. Romania, no. 51107/16, § 98, 30 November 2021; Stancu and Others v. Romania, no. 22953/16, § 147, 18 October 2022; Matalas v. Greece, no. 1864/18, § 58, 25 March 2021; and Balaskas, cited above, § 60).
  • EGMR, 26.04.2022 - 42821/18

    M c. FRANCE

    Le grief dont on entend saisir la Cour doit d'abord être soulevé, au moins en substance, dans les formes et délais prescrits par le droit interne, devant ces mêmes juridictions nationales appropriées (voir, parmi de nombreux autres, Cardot c. France, 19 mars 1991, § 34, série A no 200, Gäfgen, précité, § 142, et Matalas c. Grèce, no 1864/18, §§ 23-25, 25 mars 2021).
  • EGMR, 03.02.2022 - 66328/14

    N.M. ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

    Le grief dont on entend saisir la Cour doit d'abord être soulevé, au moins en substance, dans les formes et délais prescrits par le droit interne, devant ces mêmes juridictions nationales appropriées (voir, parmi d'autres, Cardot c. France, 19 mars 1991, § 34, série A no 200, Elçi et autres c. Turquie, no 23145/93 et no 25091/94, §§ 604 et 605, 13 novembre 2003, Azinas c. Chypre [GC], no 56679/00, § 38, CEDH 2004-III et Matalas c. Grèce, no 1864/18, § 25, 25 mars 2021).
  • EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 383/12

    KHURAL AND ZEYNALOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)

    The domestic courts are instead called upon to examine whether the context of the case, the interest of the public and the intention of the journalist justified the possible use of a dose of provocation or exaggeration (see I Avgi Publishing and Press Agency S.A. and Karis v. Greece, no. 15909/06, § 33, 5 June 2008, and Matalas v. Greece, no. 1864/18, § 50, 25 March 2021).
  • EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 12456/19

    ZEGGAI c. FRANCE

    Le grief dont on entend saisir la Cour doit d'abord être soulevé, au moins en substance, dans les formes et délais prescrits par le droit interne, devant ces mêmes juridictions nationales appropriées (voir, parmi de nombreux autres, Cardot c. France, 19 mars 1991, § 34, série A no 200, Gäfgen c. Allemagne [GC], no 22978/05, § 142, CEDH 2010, et Matalas c. Grèce, no 1864/18, §§ 23-25, 25 mars 2021).
  • EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 38288/15

    MERAHI ET DELAHAYE c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 41892/19

    THIBAUT c. FRANCE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht