Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GOLEK v. POLAND

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-3 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 04.05.2004 - 31330/02
• EGMR, 25.04.2006 - 31330/02

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2006 - 31330/02

  Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 110-111, ECHR 2000-X).
• EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86

  B. ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2006 - 31330/02

  It recalls that in view of the essential link between Article 5 § 3 of the Convention and paragraph 1 (c) of that Article, a person convicted at first instance cannot be regarded as being detained "for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence", as specified in the latter provision, but is in the position provided for by Article 5 § 1 (a), which authorises deprivation of liberty "after conviction by a competent court" (see, for example, B. v Austria, judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, pp. 14-16, §§ 36-39).

• EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 31488/07

  GORAL v. POLAND

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, for example, Bak v. Poland, no. 7870/04, ECHR 2007-... (extracts), Golek v. Poland, no. 31330/02, 25 April 2006, Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, 4 August 2006 and Kauczor v. Poland, no. 45219/06, 3 February 2009).