Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 25.04.2019 - 36469/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,10174) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TER-PETROSYAN v. ARMENIA
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 13+11-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 36469/08
- EGMR, 25.04.2019 - 36469/08
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2019 - 36469/08
Once this burden of proof has been satisfied, it falls to the applicant to establish that the remedy advanced by the Government was in fact exhausted or was for some reason inadequate and ineffective in the particular circumstances of the case (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 26839/05
KENNEDY c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2019 - 36469/08
It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one, available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible, was one which was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839/05, § 109, 18 May 2010). - EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99
Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2019 - 36469/08
46113/99 et al., ECHR 2010). - EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 23086/08
MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. ARMENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2019 - 36469/08
It notes that it has already examined and dismissed a similar claim by the Government, finding that there was not sufficient and convincing evidence to conclude that the organisers and the participants of the assembly at Freedom Square had had violent intentions and that the assembly in question had not been peaceful (see Mushegh Saghatelyan v. Armenia, no. 23086/08, §§ 229-233, 20 September 2018).
- EGMR, 03.05.2022 - 39087/15
VOLODYA AVETISYAN v. ARMENIA
The Court therefore finds it necessary to join the Government's objection to the merits of the complaint under Article 13 of the Convention (see Neshkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 36925/10 and 5 others, § 163, 27 January 2015, and Ter-Petrosyan v. Armenia, no. 36469/08, § 52, 25 April 2019).