Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KURT c. TURQUIE

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14+2, Art. 14, Art. 14+3, Art. 14+5, Art. 18, Art. 25, Art. 25 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 34 MRK
  Exception préliminaire rejetée Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 2 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 3 (fils de la requérante) Violation de l'art. 5 Violation de l'art. 3 Violation de l'art. 13 Non-violation de l'art. 14+2 Non-violation de l'art. 14+3 Non-violation de ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KURT v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14+2, Art. 14, Art. 14+3, Art. 14+5, Art. 18, Art. 25, Art. 25 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 34 MRK
  Preliminary objection rejected Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 3 (complaint in respect of applicant's son) Violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14+2 No violation of Art. 14+3 No violation ...

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 22.05.1995 - 24276/94
• EGMR, 25.05.1998 - 24276/94

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.1998 - 24276/94

  While the Court is not bound by the Commission's findings of fact and remains free to make its own appreciation in the light of all the material before it, it is only in exceptional circumstances that it will exercise its powers in this area (see, for example, the McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 50, § 169; the Aksoy v. Turkey judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, p. 2272, § 38; the Aydın v. Turkey judgment of 25 September 1997, Reports 1997-VI, pp. 1888-89, § 70; and the Mentes and Others v. Turkey judgment of 28 November 1997, Reports 1997-VIII, pp. 2709-10, § 66).

  That would have come within the line of authorities established in the Ireland v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25) and McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324) cases (inadequate command and supervision, negligence and lack of subsequent review).

• EGMR, 22.03.1995 - 18580/91

  QUINN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.1998 - 24276/94

  This insistence on the protection of the individual against any abuse of power is illustrated by the fact that Article 5 § 1 circumscribes the circumstances in which individuals may be lawfully deprived of their liberty, it being stressed that these circumstances must be given a narrow interpretation having regard to the fact that they constitute exceptions to a most basic guarantee of individual freedom (see, mutatis mutandis, the Quinn v. France judgment of 22 March 1995, Series A no. 311, p. 17, § 42).
• EGMR, 20.03.1991 - 15576/89

  CRUZ VARAS ET AUTRES c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.1998 - 24276/94

  The Court notes that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3 (see, among other authorities, the Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 31, § 83).
• EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83

  OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.1998 - 24276/94

  The objection must therefore be dismissed (see the Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1) judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, p. 28, § 56).
• EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87

  TOMASI c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.1998 - 24276/94

  Having regard to the approach taken by the Court in its Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992 (Series A no. 241-A) to evidence of ill-treatment of a detainee, she reasoned that a similar approach should be taken, mutatis mutandis, in respect of the presumed death of her son.

• EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 64088/00

  PILLA c. ITALIE

  Un requérant n'est pas tenu d'exercer les recours qui, tout en étant théoriquement de nature à constituer une voie de recours, sont en fait dépourvus de chances de succès (Comm. eur. D.H., No 24276/94, déc. 22.5.95, D.R. 81, pp. 112, 121).