Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CORNELIS c. PAYS-BAS [Extraits]

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CORNELIS v. the NETHERLANDS

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (28)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 54445/00

  VERHOEK v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2004 - 994/03

  However, the use of these kinds of statements does not in itself suffice to render the proceedings unfair (see Lorsé v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 44484/98, 27 January 2004; and Verhoek v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 54445/00, 27 January 2004).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2004 - 994/03

  The sometimes ambiguous nature of such statements and the risk that a person might be accused and tried on the basis of unverified allegations that are not necessarily disinterested must not, therefore, be underestimated (see, mutatis mutandis, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 157, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 44484/98

  LORSE v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2004 - 994/03

  However, the use of these kinds of statements does not in itself suffice to render the proceedings unfair (see Lorsé v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 44484/98, 27 January 2004; and Verhoek v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 54445/00, 27 January 2004).
• EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 44787/98

  P.G. AND J.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2004 - 994/03

  It is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, § 76, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 28901/95

  ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2004 - 994/03

  The Court's task is to scrutinise the decision-making procedure to ensure that, as far as possible, it complied with the requirements to provide adversarial proceedings and equality of arms and incorporated adequate safeguards to protect the interest of the accused (see, among other authorities, Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, §§ 60-62, ECHR 2000-II, and Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27052/95, §§ 51-53, 16 February 2000).

• EGMR, 04.05.2010 - 11603/06

  MASSMANN v. GERMANY

  Während Artikel 6 Abs. 1 grundsätzlich verlangt, dass die Strafverfolgungsbehörden der Verteidigung alle maßgeblichen, in ihrem Besitz befindlichen Beweismittel, die den Beschuldigten be- oder entlasten, offenlegen, kann es in Einzelfällen notwendig sein, bestimmte Beweismittel zurückzuhalten, um ein wichtiges öffentliches Interesse zu schützen, das gegen die Rechte des Beschuldigten abgewägt werden muss (siehe Cornelis ./. Niederlande (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (auszugsweise)).
• EGMR, 25.10.2022 - 68725/16

  XENOFONTOS AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS

  A trial where such testimony was used would also be "fair" from the standpoint of the Convention (the Government cited Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V; Habran and Dalem v. Belgium, nos.

  This is because such testimony, by its very nature, is open to manipulation and may be given purely to obtain advantages or for personal revenge (see Adamco, cited above, § 59; Habran and Dalem v. Belgium, nos. 43000/11 and 49380/11, § 100, 17 January 2017; and Armold G. Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, 25 May 2014).

• EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 77568/01

  PETKOV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

  La Cour n'est pas une instance d'appel des juridictions nationales (voir Cornelis c. Pays-Bas (déc.), no 994/03, CEDH 2004-V (extraits)) et il ne lui appartient pas de connaître des erreurs de fait ou de droit prétendument commises par une juridiction interne (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, García Ruiz c. Espagne [GC], no 30544/96, § 28, CEDH 1999-I).

 
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 32299/08

  JOVANOVIC v. SERBIA

  As regards the complaint under Article 6 § 1, the Court reiterates that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by the national courts (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I; and Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)), as it is not a court of appeal - or, as is sometimes said, a "fourth instance" (see, among many other authorities, Melnychuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 28743/03, ECHR 2005-IX).
• EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 2376/03

  TSONYO TSONEV v. BULGARIA (No. 2)

  The Court observes that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by the national courts (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I), as it is not a court of appeal from these courts (see, among many other authorities, Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)).
• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 29400/05

  COMMUNIST PARTY OF RUSSIA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court reiterates that it is not a court of appeal from the national courts (see Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)), and it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by them (see, among many other authorities, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 20612/02

  SLAVOV and OTHERSv. BULGARIA

  In so far as the applicants complained about the manner in which the various administrative courts examining their applications for judicial review had established the facts and had construed Bulgarian law, the Court observes that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly made by national courts (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I), as it is not a court of appeal from these courts (see, among many other authorities, Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)).
• EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 36207/03

  RUMYANA IVANOVA v. BULGARIA

  The Court starts with the general observation that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by the national courts (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I), as it is not a court of appeal from these courts (see, among many other authorities, Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)).
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 43000/11

  HABRAN ET DALEM c. BELGIQUE

  À la différence de l'affaire Cornelis c. Pays-Bas ((déc.), no 994/03, 25 mai 2004), les accords passés entre les autorités policières et les témoins avant leur déposition officielle n'ont pas été soumis au contrôle d'un juge ni à la contradiction des requérants.
• EGMR, 08.04.2021 - 59052/19

  GUIDI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO

  This depends on the particular circumstances in each case (ibid. § 34, and Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (extracts), and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 2156/10

  M v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37677/16

  ABDULLIN c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 12512/07

  SHIMAN c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 24867/04

  FILIPOVI v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 21124/04

  TSONYO TSONEV v. BULGARIA (No. 3)
• EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 48059/06

  DIMITROV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 26581/17

  ODDONE AND PECCI v. SAN MARINO
• EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 10958/08

  SOKOLOVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 16231/07

  VIDAKOVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 26036/08

  LALMAHOMED v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 17967/03

  STOYANOVA-TSAKOVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 23.03.2023 - 29714/18

  PIRTSKHALAVA AND TSAADZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 26338/07

  IGNJEVSKI v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 1813/09

  SELDENRIJK-RAAT AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 20309/02

  VLADISLAV ATANASOV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 68053/10

  LOLOVA AND POPOVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 02.12.2004 - 32219/02

  MILAN c. ITALIE
• EGMR - 48303/21 (anhängig)

  FAJSTAVR v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC