Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 42046/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2009,69507
EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 42046/06 (https://dejure.org/2009,69507)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25.06.2009 - 42046/06 (https://dejure.org/2009,69507)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25. Juni 2009 - 42046/06 (https://dejure.org/2009,69507)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,69507) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 42046/06
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 42046/06
    The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 34030/07

    JALOWIECKI v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 42046/06
    The Court reiterates that where an applicant is entitled to be served ex officio with a written copy of the final domestic decision, the object and purpose of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention are best served by counting the six-month period as running from the date of service of the written judgment (see Jalowiecki v. Poland, no. 34030/07, § 21, 17 February 2009, Papachelas v. Greece [GC], no. 31423/96, § 30, ECHR 1999-II, and Worm v. Austria, § 33, 29 August 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-V).
  • EGMR, 07.06.2017 - 53084/99

    KORMACHEVA ET 105 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 42046/06
    It notes that the Government did not indicate any remedy that could have expedited the determination of the first applicant's case or provided him with adequate redress for the delays that had already occurred (see Kormacheva v. Russia, no. 53084/99, 29 January 2004, § 64).
  • EGMR, 18.02.2016 - 44099/04

    FATEYENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Thus, even though L. M. Akhtyamova and A. M. Akhtyamov did not have a formal status of parties to the proceedings from the start, the Court finds that their own "civil rights and obligations" were at issue in those proceedings (contrast with Zaytsev and Others v. Russia, no. 42046/06, § 36, 25 June 2009).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht