Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 18594/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,15441) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KATELIEV v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 18594/06
The purpose of this rule is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).
- EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21
ZLATANOV v. BULGARIA
Those cases - in particular the two mentioned in paragraph 152 (b) above - are sufficiently similar to the applicant's case to permit a conclusion that a claim by him under section 49 of the 1950 Act offers a reasonable prospect of success, especially in the light of the findings of the inhouse report on the handling of the criminal cases against him drawn up in July 2020 by the Supreme Cassation Prosecutor's Office (see paragraphs 46, 49 in fine, 50 in fine, 51 in fine, 52 in fine, 53 in fine, and 58 in fine above, and compare, mutatis mutandis, Kateliev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 18594/06, § 53, 25 June 2013, and contrast, mutatis mutandis, Maslarova, cited above, §§ 35-36).