|EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 33192/07, 33194/07|
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KAÇIU AND KOTORRI v. ALBANIA
Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Six month period) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Non-pecuniary damage - award Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (englisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
- EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 21571/05
MINDADZE AND NEMSITSVERIDZE v. GEORGIAThe above findings are of themselves sufficient for the Court to conclude that the police's use of torture on the first applicant during the first questioning in the absence of a lawyer had an irretrievably prejudicial impact on the outcome of the criminal trial, and rendered the proceedings against both applicants unfair as a whole (compare with Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, §§ 118, 122 and 128-29, 25 June 2013, for a similar situation, where the use of torture to extract incriminating statements against the applicant from a co-accused rendered the proceedings against the applicant unfair).
- EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 64480/09
LULI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIAThe Court considers that the length of the proceedings is, in fact, to be attributed to the repeated referrals for fresh examination by the administrative body, which action reveals "a serious deficiency in the Albanian legal system" (see Marini, cited above, § 145; and, mutatis mutandis, Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, § 154, 25 June 2013 in the context of criminal proceedings).
- EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 9278/06
CdSNIEKS v. LATVIAAccordingly, the admission of statements obtained as a result of torture or of other ill-treatment in breach of Article 3 as evidence to establish the relevant facts in criminal proceedings renders the proceedings as a whole unfair (ibid., §§ 165 and 166; see also Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, § 117, 25 June 2013; Zamferesko v. Ukraine, no. 30075/06, § 70, 15 November 2012; Tangiyev v. Russia, no. 27610/05, § 73, 11 December 2012; and El Haski v. Belgium, no. 649/08, § 85, 25 September 2012).
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.