Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 33192/07, 33194/07   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2013,13912
EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 33192/07, 33194/07 (https://dejure.org/2013,13912)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25.06.2013 - 33192/07, 33194/07 (https://dejure.org/2013,13912)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25. Juni 2013 - 33192/07, 33194/07 (https://dejure.org/2013,13912)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,13912) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KAÇIU AND KOTORRI v. ALBANIA

    Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Six month period) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Non-pecuniary damage - award Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (englisch)

Sonstiges




Kontextvorschau:





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (10)  

  • EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 21571/05

    MINDADZE AND NEMSITSVERIDZE v. GEORGIA

    The above findings are of themselves sufficient for the Court to conclude that the police's use of torture on the first applicant during the first questioning in the absence of a lawyer had an irretrievably prejudicial impact on the outcome of the criminal trial, and rendered the proceedings against both applicants unfair as a whole (compare with Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, §§ 118, 122 and 128-29, 25 June 2013, for a similar situation, where the use of torture to extract incriminating statements against the applicant from a co-accused rendered the proceedings against the applicant unfair).
  • EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 64480/09

    LULI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

    The Court considers that the length of the proceedings is, in fact, to be attributed to the repeated referrals for fresh examination by the administrative body, which action reveals "a serious deficiency in the Albanian legal system" (see Marini, cited above, § 145; and, mutatis mutandis, Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, § 154, 25 June 2013 in the context of criminal proceedings).
  • EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 9278/06

    CdSNIEKS v. LATVIA

    Accordingly, the admission of statements obtained as a result of torture or of other ill-treatment in breach of Article 3 as evidence to establish the relevant facts in criminal proceedings renders the proceedings as a whole unfair (ibid., §§ 165 and 166; see also Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, § 117, 25 June 2013; Zamferesko v. Ukraine, no. 30075/06, § 70, 15 November 2012; Tangiyev v. Russia, no. 27610/05, § 73, 11 December 2012; and El Haski v. Belgium, no. 649/08, § 85, 25 September 2012).
  • EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 39708/13

    SHCHERBAKOV v. UKRAINE

    There is no domestic finding or finding of this Court establishing that Mi. was ill-treated (contrast, respectively, Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 36549/03, §§ 29 and 58, ECHR 2007-III, and Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, §§ 99 and 129, 25 June 2013) and no proof of ill-treatment.
  • EGMR, 21.04.2016 - 32913/03

    TOPALLAJ v. ALBANIA

    Relevant provisions about the transfer of judges are described in Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania (nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, §§ 76-77, 25 June 2013).
  • EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 960/13

    KOSTECKAS v. LITHUANIA

    It reiterates that the repetition of orders for remittal within the same set of proceedings, where such orders have been given because of errors committed by the lower courts, may reveal a serious deficiency in the judicial system (see Wierciszewska v. Poland, no. 41431/98, § 46, 25 November 2003; Huseinovic v. Slovenia, no. 75817/01, § 25, 6 April 2006; Marini v. Albania, no. 3738/02, § 145, 18 December 2007; and Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, § 154, 25 June 2013; see also Ceachir, cited above, § 50).
  • EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 37715/11

    SAYGI v. TURKEY

    However, in so far as the applicant's claim can be understood as relating to non-pecuniary damage, it is to be noted that the Court has in a number of judgments entertained similar requests where the applicant left the determination of the amount to the Court's discretion (see, inter alia, Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 6492/11, §§ 112-114, 3 July 2012 and Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, §§ 165-167, 25 June 2013).
  • EGMR - 58662/11 (anhängig)

    SKOMOROKHOV v. UKRAINE

    (c) Was the fairness of the trial undermined by the admission as evidence of the statements of the applicant's co-defendants allegedly obtained in breach of their rights under Article 3 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, 25 June 2013)?.
  • EGMR - 54091/13 (anhängig)

    BRAKA v. ALBANIA

    Has there been a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention as regards the length of the overall court proceedings, particularly the proceedings before the Supreme Court (see for example Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, § 151, 25 June 2013 and Luli and Others v. Albania, nos. 64480/09 and 5 others, §§ 95-96, 1 April 2014)?.
  • EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 48915/10

    NICULESCU v. ROMANIA

    The Court also notes that even if the applicant was arrested, she was so in relation to a number of other offences for which she was indicted, she was never detained in relation to the offences that are the subject matter of this application (see, per a contrario, Kaçiu and Kotorri v. Albania, nos. 33192/07 and 33194/07, § 150, 25 June 2013 and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 187, 22 May 2012).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht