Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16, 79503/16 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MARTÍNEZ AGIRRE AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (5) Neu Zitiert selbst (16)
- EGMR, 27.11.2003 - 62902/00
ZOLLMANN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16
In the absence of a "criminal charge", where no such criminal proceedings are, or have been in existence, Article 6 § 2 has been found not to be applicable (see Zollman v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902/00, ECHR 2003-XII; Blake v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 68890/01, §§ 123-24, 25 October 2005; Gogitidze and Others v. Georgia, no. 36862/05, 12 May 2015; and Sharxhi and Others v. Albania, no. 10613/16, § 178, 11 January 2018).To a certain extent, the protection afforded under Article 6 § 2 in this respect may overlap with the protection afforded by Article 8 (see, for example, Zollman v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902/00, ECHR 2003-XII, and Taliadorou and Stylianou v. Cyprus, nos.
- EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09
ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16
The Constitutional Court examined the Court's case-law (see, among other authorities, Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424/09, ECHR 2013) and concluded that there was no link between the two sets of proceedings at issue (the compensation proceedings and the previous criminal proceedings) such as to engage Article 6 § 2 of the Convention.The Court has acknowledged in its case-law the existence of two aspects to the protection afforded by the presumption of innocence: a procedural aspect relating to the conduct of the criminal trial, and a second aspect, which aims to protect individuals who have been acquitted of a criminal charge, or in respect of whom criminal proceedings have been discontinued, from being treated by public officials and authorities as though they are in fact guilty of the offence charged (see, generally, Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424/09, §§ 93-94, ECHR 2013, and G.I.E.M. S.R.L. and Others v. Italy [GC], nos. 1828/06 and 2 others, § 314, 28 June 2018).
- EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 60879/12
RUPP v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16
60879/12 and 60892/12, §§ 64-65, 17 November 2015).
- EGMR, 11.02.2003 - 29327/95
O. c. NORVEGE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16
In cases concerning these issues, the Court found that the rulings on the applicants" entitlement to costs and/or compensation were "consequences and necessary concomitants of", or a "direct sequel to", the conclusion of the criminal proceedings (see Englert, § 35, and Nölkenbockhoff, § 35, both cited above) or that the applicants" compensation claim "not only followed the criminal proceedings in time but was also tied to those proceedings in legislation and practice, with regard to both jurisdiction and subject matter" (see O. v. Norway, no. 29327/95, § 38, ECHR 2003-II). - EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 53465/11
VLIEELAND BODDY ET MARCELO LANNI c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16
53465/11 and 9634/12, §§ 38-49, 16 February 2016). - EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 31816/08
STIRMANOV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16
The Court reiterates that, as expressly stated in the terms of the Article itself, the protection afforded by Article 6 § 2 applies where a person is "charged with a criminal offence" within the autonomous meaning of Article 6 (see Adolf v. Austria, 26 March 1982, § 30, Series A no. 49, and Stirmanov v. Russia, no. 31816/08, §§ 37-38, 29 January 2019). - EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05
TALIADOROU AND STYLIANOU v. CYPRUS
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16
39627/05 and 39631/05, §§ 27 and 56-59, 16 October 2008). - EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
McFARLANE v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16
A "criminal charge" within the autonomous meaning of Article 6 §§ 1, 2 and 3 exists from the moment that an individual is officially notified by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence, or from the point at which his situation has been substantially affected by actions taken by the authorities as a result of a suspicion against him (see Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, §§ 42-46, Series A no. 35; Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51; Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, §§ 162-64, 24 April 2008, in an extradition context; McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 143, 10 September 2010; and, more recently, Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, §§ 110-11, ECHR 2017). - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16
A "criminal charge" within the autonomous meaning of Article 6 §§ 1, 2 and 3 exists from the moment that an individual is officially notified by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence, or from the point at which his situation has been substantially affected by actions taken by the authorities as a result of a suspicion against him (see Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, §§ 42-46, Series A no. 35; Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51; Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, §§ 162-64, 24 April 2008, in an extradition context; McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 143, 10 September 2010; and, more recently, Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, §§ 110-11, ECHR 2017). - EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 36862/05
GOGITIDZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 75529/16
In the absence of a "criminal charge", where no such criminal proceedings are, or have been in existence, Article 6 § 2 has been found not to be applicable (see Zollman v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902/00, ECHR 2003-XII; Blake v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 68890/01, §§ 123-24, 25 October 2005; Gogitidze and Others v. Georgia, no. 36862/05, 12 May 2015; and Sharxhi and Others v. Albania, no. 10613/16, § 178, 11 January 2018). - EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 25720/05
TENDAM AGAINST SPAIN AND 1 OTHER CASE
- EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 10613/16
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 28.06.2018 - 1828/06
G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY
- EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75
DEWEER c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 68890/01
BLAKE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 26.03.1982 - 8269/78
Adolf ./. Österreich
- EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 68291/17
MUGURUZA BARTOLOME AND BARTOLOME LLAMAZARES v. SPAIN
Domestic proceedings 6. The domestic proceedings are similar to those described in Larrañaga Arando and Others v. Spain (dec.), (no. 73911/16, 25 June 2019) and Martínez Agirre and Others v. Spain (dec.), (nos. 75529/16 and 79503/16, 26 June 2019).75529/16 and 79503/16, §§ 21-30, ECHR 2019.
- EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 3087/17
ITURBE ABASOLO AND PEREZ DE ARENAZA ITURBE v. SPAIN
Domestic proceedings 6. The domestic proceedings are similar to those described in Larrañaga Arando and Others v. Spain (dec.), (no. 73911/16, 25 June 2019) and Martínez Agirre and Others v. Spain (dec.), (nos. 75529/16 and 79503/16, 26 June 2019).75529/16 and 79503/16, §§ 21-30, ECHR 2019.
- EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 57195/17
Keine Verletzung des Rechts auf privates Familienleben: Maddie McCann's Eltern …
La Cour note que les juridictions civiles saisies n'étaient pas, en l'espèce, légalement appelées à se pencher sur le contenu de la décision de classement sans suite du 21 juillet 2008 (comparer avec O.L. c. Finlande (déc.), no 61110/00, 5 juillet 2005, et Martínez Aguirre et autres c. Espagne (déc.), nos 75529/16 et 79503/16, §§ 46-48, 25 juin 2019). - EGMR, 09.02.2021 - 9295/17
IJURCO ILLARRAMENDI AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
75529/16 and 79503/16, § 21 - 30, ECHR 2019. - EGMR, 05.05.2020 - 24265/17
PASCUAL GONZALEZ v. SPAIN
75529/16 and 79503/16, § 21 - 30, ECHR 2019.