Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STAVROPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  STAVROPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  Art. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 1, Art. 9 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 300/11

  C.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 52484/18

  The subjective perception must be justified on objective grounds (see, with further references, C.P. v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 300/11, § 42, 6 September 2016).
• EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 39311/05

  KARAKO v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 52484/18

  The Court further reiterates that, where several remedies are available, the applicant is not required to pursue more than one and it is normally that individual's choice as to which remedy to pursue (see Karakó v. Hungary, no. 39311/05, § 14, 28 April 2009; Hilal v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45276/99, 8 February 2000; and Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 23, Series A no. 32).
• EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

  KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 52484/18

  The Court reiterates that as enshrined in Article 9 of the Convention, freedom of thought, conscience and religion is one of the foundations of a "democratic society" within the meaning of the Convention (see Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A).

 
• EGMR, 12.12.2002 - 1988/02

  SOFIANOPOULOS, SPAÏDIOTIS, METALLINOS et KONTOGIANNIS contre la GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 52484/18

  1977/02 and 2 others, ECHR 2002-X)).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 52484/18

  The Court further reiterates that, where several remedies are available, the applicant is not required to pursue more than one and it is normally that individual's choice as to which remedy to pursue (see Karakó v. Hungary, no. 39311/05, § 14, 28 April 2009; Hilal v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45276/99, 8 February 2000; and Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 23, Series A no. 32).
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 45276/99

  Tansania, CUF, Civic United Front, Oppositionelle, Inhaftierung, Folter, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 52484/18

  The Court further reiterates that, where several remedies are available, the applicant is not required to pursue more than one and it is normally that individual's choice as to which remedy to pursue (see Karakó v. Hungary, no. 39311/05, § 14, 28 April 2009; Hilal v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45276/99, 8 February 2000; and Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 23, Series A no. 32).
• EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05

  KOROLEV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 52484/18

  A violation of the Convention may concern important questions of principle and thus cause a significant disadvantage regardless of pecuniary interest (see Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010-V).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 52484/18

  The Court also reiterates that it is incumbent on the Government pleading non-exhaustion to satisfy it that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say that it was accessible, was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see, in particular, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V; Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006-II; Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], no. 17153/11 and 29 others, § 74, 25 March 2014; and Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no. 42219/07, § 85, 9 July 2015).
• EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 24645/94

  BUSCARINI ET AUTRES c. SAINT-MARIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 52484/18

  That freedom entails, inter alia, freedom to hold or not to hold religious beliefs and to practise or not to practise a religion (see, among other authorities, Kokkinakis, cited above, § 31, and Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I).

• BAG, 21.07.2022 - 2 AZR 130/21

  Der Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union wird gemäß Art. 267 AEUV um die …

  Danach hat jede Person das Recht auf Gedanken-, Gewissens- und Religionsfreiheit, wobei dieses Recht nicht nur die Freiheit umfasst, seine Religion oder Weltanschauung einzeln oder gemeinsam mit anderen öffentlich oder privat zu bekennen, sondern auch die negative Religionsfreiheit (EGMR 25. Juni 2020 - 52484/18, CE:ECHR:2020: 0625JUD005248418 - Rn. 43 f.; 6. April 2017 - 10138/11, 16687/11, 25359/11, 28919/11, CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD001013811 - Rn. 77 ff.) .
• BAG, 01.02.2024 - 2 AZR 196/22

  Der Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union wird gemäß Art. 267 AEUV um die …

  Danach hat jede Person das Recht auf Gedanken-, Gewissens- und Religionsfreiheit, wobei dieses Recht nicht nur die Freiheit umfasst, seine Religion oder Weltanschauung einzeln oder gemeinsam mit anderen öffentlich oder privat zu bekennen, sondern auch die negative Religionsfreiheit (EGMR 25. Juni 2020 - 52484/18 - Rn. 43 f.; 6. April 2017 - 10138/11, 16687/11, 25359/11, 28919/11 - Rn. 77 ff.) .