Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JAFAROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  JAFAROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 3532/07

  ORTHODOX OHRID ARCHDIOCESE v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 27309/14

  States have a right to satisfy themselves that an association's aim and activities are in conformity with the rules laid down in legislation, but they must do so in a manner compatible with their obligations under the Convention and subject to review by the Convention institutions (see, among other authorities, Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, § 88, ECHR 2004-I; The United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 34960/04, § 33, 18 October 2011; and "Orthodox Ohrid Archdiocese (Greek-Orthodox Ohrid Archdiocese of the Pec Patriarchy)" v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 3532/07, § 94, 16 November 2017).
• EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 27798/08

  HAYVAN YETISTIRICILERI SENDIKASI c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 27309/14

  The Court reiterates that States are entitled - subject to the condition of proportionality - to require organisations seeking official registration to comply with reasonable legal formalities (see Hayvan Yeti??tiricileri Sendikasi v. Turkey (dec.), no. 27798/08, 11 January 2011; Republican Party of Russia v. Russia, no. 12976/07, § 87, 12 April 2011; and The United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden - PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), nos.
• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 41561/07

  THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN - PIRIN AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 27309/14

  41561/07 and 20972/08, § 83, 18 October 2011; see also, mutatis mutandis, Tebieti Mühafize Cemiyyeti and Israfilov v. Azerbaijan, no. 37083/03, § 72, ECHR 2009).

 
• EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 44774/98

  LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 27309/14

  The role of adjudication vested in the courts is precisely to dissipate such interpretational doubts as remain, taking into account the changes in everyday practice (see Gorzelik and Others, cited above, § 65, and Leyla ??ahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, § 91, ECHR 2005-XI).
• EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 44158/98

  GORZELIK AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 27309/14

  States have a right to satisfy themselves that an association's aim and activities are in conformity with the rules laid down in legislation, but they must do so in a manner compatible with their obligations under the Convention and subject to review by the Convention institutions (see, among other authorities, Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, § 88, ECHR 2004-I; The United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 34960/04, § 33, 18 October 2011; and "Orthodox Ohrid Archdiocese (Greek-Orthodox Ohrid Archdiocese of the Pec Patriarchy)" v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 3532/07, § 94, 16 November 2017).
• EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 39748/98

  MAESTRI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 27309/14

  The law should be accessible to the persons concerned and formulated with sufficient precision to enable them - if need be, with appropriate advice - to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see, for example, Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I; Kudrevicius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, § 108-09, ECHR 2015; and Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931/13, § 143, 27 June 2017).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 27309/14

  Unless the interpretation is arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable, the Court's role is confined to ascertaining whether the effects of that interpretation are compatible with the Convention (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 149, 20 March 2018).

• EGMR, 20.05.2021 - 46930/10

  MEHMAN ALIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  A detailed description of the relevant provisions of the 1995 Constitution, the Law on non-governmental organisations (public associations and funds) of 13 June 2000 ("the Law on NGOs"), the Law on state registration and the state register of legal entities of 12 December 2003 ("the Law on State Registration"), as well as of the relevant international documents, may be found in Jafarov and Others v. Azerbaijan (no. 27309/14, §§ 31, 36-37, 41 and 43-44, 25 July 2019).

  The Court notes that the principles relevant to the present complaints are set out, among others, in Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC] (no. 44158/98, §§ 52-53 and 64-65, ECHR 2004-I); Koretskyy and Others v. Ukraine (no. 40269/02, §§ 38-39, 43 and 46-47, 3 April 2008); The United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2) (no. 34960/04, §§ 30-31 and 33, 18 October 2011); and Jafarov and Others (no. 27309/14, §§ 54-55, 62-63, 69-70 and 80-81, 25 July 2019).

• EGMR, 20.05.2021 - 69466/14

  ABDULLAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  A detailed description of the relevant provisions of the 1995 Constitution, the Law on non-governmental organisations (public associations and funds) of 13 June 2000 ("the Law on NGOs"), the Law on state registration and the state register of legal entities of 12 December 2003 ("the Law on State Registration"), as well as of the relevant international documents, may be found in Jafarov and Others v. Azerbaijan (no. 27309/14, §§ 31, 36-37, 41 and 43-44, 25 July 2019).

  The Court notes that the principles relevant to the present complaints are set out, among others, in Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC] (no. 44158/98, §§ 52-53 and 64-65, ECHR 2004-I); Koretskyy and Others v. Ukraine (no. 40269/02, §§ 38-39, 43 and 46-47, 3 April 2008); The United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2) (no. 34960/04, §§ 30-31 and 33, 18 October 2011); and Jafarov and Others v. Azerbaijan (no. 27309/14, §§ 54-55, 62-63, 69-70 and 80-81, 25 July 2019).

• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 10299/15

  MARIYA ALEKHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  41561/07 and 20972/08, § 83, 18 October 2011; and Jafarov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 27309/14, § 69, 25 July 2019).

 
• EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 58262/10

  KAZAN c. TÜRKIYE

  Pour apprécier la légalité d'une ingérence, et en particulier la prévisibilité du droit interne en question, la Cour tient compte tant du texte de la loi que de la manière dont elle a été appliquée et interprétée par les autorités internes (Jafarov et autres c. Azerbaïdjan, no 27309/14, § 70, 25 juillet 2019).
• EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 13918/06

  SAVENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  41561/07 and 20972/08, § 83, 18 October 2011; and Jafarov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 27309/14, § 69, 25 July 2019).
• EGMR, 09.12.2021 - 56899/16

  NASIRLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the alleged breach of the right to freedom of association, namely the right to form an association (see, for example, Jafarov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 27309/14, 25 July 2019), and the alleged breach of the right to a reasoned decision (see, for example, Mazahir Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 39331/09, 2 April 2020).