Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 25.08.2005 - 23695/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,38312) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CLARKE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CLARKE c. ROYAUME-UNI [Extraits]
Wird zitiert von ... (4) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.08.2005 - 23695/02
However, far from being dependent on the outcome of proceedings, Article 6 applies where there is a dispute of a "genuine and serious nature" as to a civil right or obligation (Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 87, ECHR 2001-V). - EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 48843/99
COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.08.2005 - 23695/02
The concepts of independence and objective impartiality are closely linked and the Court will consider them together as they relate to the present case (see Cooper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843/99, § 104, ECHR 2003-XII). - EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65
RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.08.2005 - 23695/02
As to an appearance of independence and the requirement of impartiality, the Court recalls that tribunals must be independent of the executive and of the parties (Ringeisen v. Austria, judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, § 95). - EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77
CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.08.2005 - 23695/02
(Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, § 79).
- EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 20261/12
Ungarn verstößt gegen Menschenrechtskonvention
The Court has added in this regard that what is at stake is "the confidence which such tribunals must inspire in the public" (see Clarke v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23695/02, ECHR 2005-X). - Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 17.12.2020 - C-824/18
Generalanwalt Tanchev: Das polnische Gesetz, das eingeführt wurde, um die …
61 Vgl. EGMR, Findlay/Vereinigtes Königreich (Nr. 22107/93), § 73, EGMR, Sramek/Österreich (Nr. 8790/79), § 42, EGMR, Campbell und Fell/Vereinigtes Königreich (Nrn. 7819/77 und 7878/77), § 78, EGMR, Cooper/Vereinigtes Königreich (Nr. 48843/99), § 104, EGMR, Sacilor Lormines/Frankreich (Nr. 65411/01), § 63, und EGMR, Clarke/Vereinigtes Königreich (Nr. 23695/02). - EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 32271/04
POPPE v. THE NETHERLANDS
In the light of this finding, the Court is not required to consider whether any lacunae in judicial protection at first instance necessitated the quashing of the first instance judgment by the appellate courts in the subsequent appeal and cassation proceedings or the remittal of the applicant's case (see Clarke v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23695/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts). - EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 21102/03
BUCURIA INC AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
Secondly, it must also be impartial from an objective viewpoint, that is, it must offer sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see, inter alia, Cooper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843/99, § 104, ECHR 2003-XII; see also Clarke v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 23695/02, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)).