Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AYDIN c. TURQUIE

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 25, Art. 25 Abs. 1, Art. 28, Art. 28 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 34, Art. 53 MRK
  Exception préliminaire rejetée (forclusion) Violation de l'Art. 3 Violation de l'art. 13 Non-violation de l'art. 25-1 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 6-1 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 28-1-a Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 53 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AYDIN v. TURKEY

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 25, Art. 25 Abs. 1, Art. 28, Art. 28 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 34, Art. 53 MRK
  Preliminary objection rejected (estoppel) Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 No violation of Art. 25-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 28-1-a Not necessary to examine Art. 53 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
• institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

  Aydin gegen die Türkei

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 28.11.1994 - 23178/94
• EGMR, 25.09.1997 - 23178/94

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 23.03.1995 - 15318/89

  LOIZIDOU c. TURQUIE (EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.1997 - 23178/94

  They are therefore estopped from raising objections to the admissibility of the application before the Court (see the Loizidou v. Turkey judgment of 23 March 1995 (preliminary objections), Series A no. 310, p. 19, § 44).

• EGMR, 31.03.2015 - 9935/06

  NALBANDYAN v. ARMENIA

  It is not necessary in this case to find the interrogation techniques with which the Court is familiar - Palestinian hanging (see Aksoy v. Turkey, cited above), beatings (see Dikme v. Turkey, cited above), falaka (Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000-VII), electric shocks (see Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, ECHR 2000-X, and Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, 26 January 2006) or rape (see Aydin v. Turkey [GC], no. 23178/94, 25 September 1997) - but the intense psychological suffering arising from the very close family ties between the two victims was considered sufficient to find that the physical violence which occurred during the period in custody had amounted to an act of torture.