Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ATES MIMARLIK MÜHENDISLIK A.S v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 33275/05
• EGMR, 27.03.2019 - 33275/05

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 33275/05

  The Court reiterates that the right of access to a court, as one of the broader concepts of a fair trial, secures to everyone the right to have a claim relating to their civil rights and obligations brought before a court and to have a judicial determination on the merits of their case following a fair hearing (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18, and Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 43, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 52658/99

  MEHMET AND SUNA YIGIT v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 33275/05

  Consequently, it considers that the most appropriate form of redress would be the re-opening of the proceedings in accordance with the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, should the applicant so request (see Mehmet and Suna YiÄ?it v. Turkey, no. 52658/99, § 47, 17 July 2007).
• EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 11931/03

  TETERINY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 33275/05

  As regards material damage, the Court reiterates that the most appropriate form of redress for a violation of Article 6 § 1 would be to ensure that the applicant, as far as possible, is put in the position in which it would have been had this provision not been disregarded (see Teteriny v. Russia, no. 11931/03, § 56, 30 June 2005, and Jelicic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 41183/02, § 53, ECHR 2006-XII).

 
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 33275/05

  Furthermore, a limitation will not be compatible with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 33275/05

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria; the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 42527/98

  Enteignung eines Gemäldes in Tschechien auf Grund der Benes-Dekrete - …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 33275/05

  The Court reiterates that the right of access to a court, as one of the broader concepts of a fair trial, secures to everyone the right to have a claim relating to their civil rights and obligations brought before a court and to have a judicial determination on the merits of their case following a fair hearing (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18, and Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 43, ECHR 2001-VIII).