Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 25.09.2014 - 29878/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,26771) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KARIN ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Karin Andersson and Others v. Sweden
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 25.09.2014 - 29878/09
- EGMR, 14.09.2016 - 29878/09
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 61507/00
ANDREI GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2014 - 29878/09
Such an obligation may exceptionally exist, depending on the particular circumstances of each case (see, for example, Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX, and Andrei Georgiev v. Bulgaria, no. 61507/00, § 78, 26 July 2007). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95
ATHANASSOGLOU ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2014 - 29878/09
Furthermore, there was a genuine and serious dispute over those rights and the domestic proceedings were decisive for them (see, for instance, Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01
BRUSCO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2014 - 29878/09
Such an obligation may exceptionally exist, depending on the particular circumstances of each case (see, for example, Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX, and Andrei Georgiev v. Bulgaria, no. 61507/00, § 78, 26 July 2007). - EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 43570/10
MARINKOVIC v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2014 - 29878/09
Finally, with respect to the Government's submission that the applicants could claim compensation for a violation of the Convention before the Swedish courts or the Chancellor of Justice, the Court, in several cases, has observed that domestic case-law has developed since 2005 and has concluded that, following a Supreme Court judgment of 3 December 2009 (NJA 2009 N 70), there is now an accessible and effective remedy of general applicability, capable of affording redress in respect of alleged violations of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Eriksson v. Sweden, cited above, §§ 48-52, and Marinkovic v. Sweden (dec.), no. 43570/10, § 43, 10 December 2013, and - in regard to the domestic case-law developments - the latter decision, §§ 21-31).