Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OSKIRKO v. LITHUANIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  OSKIRKO v. LITHUANIA

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 62564/13

  CIAPAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 14411/16

  For the relevant domestic law and practice as regards visits, see Varnas v. Lithuania (no. 42615/06, §§ 58-61, 9 July 2013) and Ciapas v. Lithuania, ((dec.), no. 62564/13, §§ 10-14, 4 July 2017).

  According to the Court's established case-law, the concept of "victim" must be interpreted autonomously and irrespective of domestic concepts such as those concerning an interest or capacity to act (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 35, ECHR 2004-III, and Ciapas v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 62564/13, § 27, 4 July 2017).

• EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14097/12

  VARGA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 14411/16

  The Court refers to the principles summarised in its case-law regarding conditions of detention (see, for instance, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 90-94, ECHR 2000-XI; Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 139-159, 10 January 2012; Varga and Others v. Hungary, nos. 14097/12 and 5 others, §§ 69-78, 10 March 2015; Mironovas and Others, cited above, §§ 115-123; and Mursic, cited above, §§ 96-141).
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

  ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 14411/16

  The Court refers to the principles summarised in its case-law regarding conditions of detention (see, for instance, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 90-94, ECHR 2000-XI; Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 139-159, 10 January 2012; Varga and Others v. Hungary, nos. 14097/12 and 5 others, §§ 69-78, 10 March 2015; Mironovas and Others, cited above, §§ 115-123; and Mursic, cited above, §§ 96-141).
• EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00

  GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 14411/16

  According to the Court's established case-law, the concept of "victim" must be interpreted autonomously and irrespective of domestic concepts such as those concerning an interest or capacity to act (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 35, ECHR 2004-III, and Ciapas v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 62564/13, § 27, 4 July 2017).

• EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20

  EINIKIS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA

  In several cases concerning Lukiskes Remand Prison, the Court, relying on reports issued by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the fact that, in addition to the inadequate partitioning of sanitary facilities, the applicants had been locked up in their cells for twenty-three hours a day and had not been able to freely move around the prison during the day (see Oskirko v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 14411/16, §§ 44-45, 25 September 2018; Visniakovas v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 25988/16, §§ 31-33, 18 December 2018; and Steponavicius v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 6982/18, §§ 18-19, 17 December 2019).