Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 41749/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,29729) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MARTINOVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 5667/02
KÉRÉTCHACHVILI c. GEORGIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 41749/12
An application may be rejected as abusive under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention if, among other reasons, it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among other authorities, Kerechashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, ECHR 2006-V). - EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 21447/03
PREDESCU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 41749/12
Incomplete and therefore misleading information may also amount to abuse of the right of application, especially if the information concerns the very core of the case and no sufficient explanation is given for the failure to disclose that information (see Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, §§ 25 and 26, 2 December 2008, and Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no. 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014). - EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 28971/05
KUDIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 41749/12
The Court has always held that a decision or measure favourable to an applicant is not in principle sufficient to deprive him of his victim status unless the national authorities have acknowledged the alleged breach and afforded appropriate and sufficient redress (see Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 180 and 193, ECHR 2006-V, and Kudic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 28971/05, § 17, 9 December 2008). - EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 74221/01
DUBENKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 41749/12
Therefore, she may still claim to be a victim, within the meaning of Article 34, of an alleged violation of the rights guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in relation to the period during which the said decisions remained unenforced (see, mutatis mutandis, Dubenko v. Ukraine, no. 74221/01, § 36, 11 January 2005). - EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11
Gesichtsschleier-Verbot rechtens
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 41749/12
Bearing in mind that the inadmissibility of an application on the ground that it constitutes an abuse of the right of application must remain an exception (see S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 68, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), the Court dismisses the Government's objection in this regard.