Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YURIY ROMANOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 08.12.1999 - 28541/95

  PELLEGRIN v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 69341/01

  They then find themselves in a situation exactly comparable to that of employees under private law in that the special relationship of trust and loyalty binding them to the State has ceased to exist and the employee can no longer wield a portion of the State's sovereign power (see Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541/95, § 67, ECHR 1999-VIII).
• EGMR, 15.03.2001 - 30517/96

  AUNOLA v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 69341/01

  The Court reiterates that the Convention does not guarantee, as such, the right to an old-age pension or any social benefit of a particular amount (see, for example, Aunola v. Finland (dec.), no. 30517/96, 15 March 2001).
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99

  RIABYKH c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 69341/01

  The Court finds that this application is similar to the case of Ryabykh v. Russia (no. 52854/99, ECHR 2003-IX), where it was said, in so far as relevant for present purposes:.
• EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 69529/01

  PRAVEDNAYA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 69341/01

  However a "claim" - even concerning a pension - can constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 where it has a sufficient basis in national law, for example where it is confirmed by a final court judgment (see Pravednaya v. Russia, no. 69529/01, § 38, 18 November 2004, and Kopecký v. Slovakia judgment, [GC], no. 44912/98, § 35, ECHR 2004-..).
• EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91

  PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2005 - 69341/01

  The Court considers that by depriving the applicant of the right to benefit from the pension in the amount secured in a final judgment, the State upset a fair balance between the interests at stake (see, mutatis mutandis, Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, § 43).".

• EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 78630/12

  B. c. SUISSE

  La Cour rappelle également que la Convention ne crée pas, en tant que tel, de droit à une pension ou autre prestation sociale d'un montant particulier (Youri Romanov c. Russie, no 69341/01, § 45, 25 octobre 2005).
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 7186/09

  DI TRIZIO c. SUISSE

  La Cour rappelle également que la Convention ne crée pas, en tant que tel, de droit à une pension ou autre prestation sociale d'un montant particulier (Youri Romanov c. Russie, no 69341/01, § 45, 25 octobre 2005).
• EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 65550/13

  BELLI ET ARQUIER-MARTINEZ c. SUISSE

  La Cour rappelle également que la Convention ne crée pas, en tant que tel, de droit à une pension ou autre prestation sociale d'un montant particulier (Youri Romanov c. Russie, no 69341/01, § 45, 25 octobre 2005).