Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 42940/06   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2007,65245
EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 42940/06 (https://dejure.org/2007,65245)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25.10.2007 - 42940/06 (https://dejure.org/2007,65245)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 25. Januar 2007 - 42940/06 (https://dejure.org/2007,65245)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,65245) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung




Kontextvorschau:





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (16)  

  • EGMR, 22.12.2008 - 46468/06

    ALEKSANYAN v. RUSSIA

    Such a length of pre-trial detention is a matter of concern for the Court (see Govorushko v. Russia, no. 42940/06, § 45, 25 October 2007).
  • EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 2052/08

    KOKOSHKINA v. RUSSIA

    This state of Russian law precludes any legal opportunity for the applicant to receive compensation for the detention which was effected in breach of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Korshunov v. Russia, no. 38971/06, § 62, 25 October 2007, and Govorushko v. Russia, no. 42940/06, § 60, 25 October 2007).
  • EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 9096/09

    ABASHEV CONTRE LA RUSSIE ET 122 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    42940/06.
  • EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17504/07

    CHUPRIKOV v. RUSSIA

    This state of Russian law precludes any legal possibility for the applicant to receive compensation for the detention which was effected in breach of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Govorushko v. Russia, no. 42940/06, §§ 57-61, 25 October 2007, and Korshunov, cited above, §§ 59-63).
  • EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 38971/06

    KORSHUNOV v. RUSSIA

    Further to the applicant's request, the Court granted priority to the application (Rule 41 of the Rules of Court) and decided that the proceedings in this case would be conducted simultaneously with those in application no. 42940/06 Govorushko v. Russia (Rule 42 of the Rules of Court).
  • EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 28020/05

    YEVGENIY GUSEV v. RUSSIA

    The "operational information" which served as a basis for the placement of the applicant's name on the wanted list was not examined in the court proceedings, and, as such, reference to such "information" is too imprecise to support the conclusion that the applicant was absconding (see, mutatis mutandis, Govorushko v. Russia, no. 42940/06, §§ 41 and 46, 25 October 2007, and Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, § 187, 22 December 2008).
  • EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 16266/03

    SHERSTOBITOV v. RUSSIA

    This state of Russian law precludes any legal opportunity for the applicant to receive compensation for his detention, which was effected in breach of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Korshunov v. Russia, no. 38971/06, § 62, 25 October 2007, and Govorushko v. Russia, no. 42940/06, § 60, 25 October 2007).
  • EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 10638/08

    ALEKHIN v. RUSSIA

    This state of Russian law precludes any legal possibility for an applicant to receive compensation for detention effected in breach of Article 5 §§ 3 or 4 of the Convention (see Korshunov v. Russia, no. 38971/06, § 62, 25 October 2007, and Govorushko v. Russia, no. 42940/06, § 60, 25 October 2007).
  • EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 27335/13

    SHALYA v. RUSSIA

    The Court has already found that the present state of Russian tort law precludes the individual who has not been cleared of criminal charges against him from receiving compensation for the pre-trial detention that was effected in breach of Article 5 of the Convention (see Abashev v. Russia, no. 9096/09, § 30, 27 June 2013; Korshunov v. Russia, no. 38971/06, § 62, 25 October 2007, and Govorushko v. Russia, no. 42940/06, § 60, 25 October 2007).
  • EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 3223/07

    ALEKSEY MAKAROV v. RUSSIA

    This is particularly relevant in the Russian legal system where the characterisation in law of the facts - and thus the sentence faced by the applicant - is determined by the prosecution without judicial review of the issue whether the evidence that has been obtained supports a reasonable suspicion that the applicant has committed the alleged offence (see Govorushko v. Russia, no. 42940/06, § 48, 25 October 2007).
  • EGMR, 30.11.2017 - 4622/09

    POLTORATSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.03.2009 - 36551/07

    YELIZAROV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 77153/13

    KHASANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 9994/06

    PODDUBNYY AND BABKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 36985/07

    GOGITIDZE v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 10033/10

    KOLODYAZHNYY v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht