Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 966/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,60905) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ALMAYEVA v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6 Violation of P1-1 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 15021/02
WASSERMAN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 966/03
Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Reynbakh v. Russia, no. 23405/03, §§ 23 et seq., 29 September 2005; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, §§ 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Petrushko v. Russia, no. 36494/02, §§ 23 et seq., 24 February 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, §§ 35 et seq., 18 November 2004; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III), the Court finds that by failing to comply with the judgment of 20 August 2001, as upheld on 25 September 2001, the domestic authorities violated the applicant's right to a court and prevented her from receiving the money which she was entitled to receive. - EGMR, 13.01.2005 - 5124/03
GIZZATOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 966/03
Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Reynbakh v. Russia, no. 23405/03, §§ 23 et seq., 29 September 2005; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, §§ 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Petrushko v. Russia, no. 36494/02, §§ 23 et seq., 24 February 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, §§ 35 et seq., 18 November 2004; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III), the Court finds that by failing to comply with the judgment of 20 August 2001, as upheld on 25 September 2001, the domestic authorities violated the applicant's right to a court and prevented her from receiving the money which she was entitled to receive. - EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 36494/02
PETRUSHKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 966/03
Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Reynbakh v. Russia, no. 23405/03, §§ 23 et seq., 29 September 2005; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, §§ 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Petrushko v. Russia, no. 36494/02, §§ 23 et seq., 24 February 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, §§ 35 et seq., 18 November 2004; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III), the Court finds that by failing to comply with the judgment of 20 August 2001, as upheld on 25 September 2001, the domestic authorities violated the applicant's right to a court and prevented her from receiving the money which she was entitled to receive. - EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 23405/03
REYNBAKH v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 966/03
Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Reynbakh v. Russia, no. 23405/03, §§ 23 et seq., 29 September 2005; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, §§ 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Petrushko v. Russia, no. 36494/02, §§ 23 et seq., 24 February 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, §§ 35 et seq., 18 November 2004; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III), the Court finds that by failing to comply with the judgment of 20 August 2001, as upheld on 25 September 2001, the domestic authorities violated the applicant's right to a court and prevented her from receiving the money which she was entitled to receive.