Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 25.11.1992 - 12728/87 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ABDOELLA c. PAYS-BAS
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Exception préliminaire rejetée (tardiveté) Violation de l'Art. 6-1 Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ABDOELLA v. THE NETHERLANDS
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Preliminary objection rejected (out of time) Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings ... - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 10.04.1991 - 12728/87
- EGMR, 25.11.1992 - 12728/87
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 28.08.1992 - 13704/88
SCHWABE v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1992 - 12728/87
3 (art. 5-3), that persons held in detention pending trial are entitled to "special diligence" on the part of the competent authorities (see, as the most recent authorities, the Tomasi judgment of 27 August 1992 mentioned above, p. 35, para. 84; the Herczegfalvy v. Austria judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 242-B, p. 23, para. 71). - EGMR, 31.03.1992 - 18020/91
X c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1992 - 12728/87
This Court has in the past held that what was at stake for the applicant had to be taken into account in assessing the reasonableness of the length of proceedings (see particularly the X v. France judgment of 31 March 1992, Series A no. 234-C, pp. 90-91, para. 32; the H. v. the United Kingdom judgment of 8 July 1987, Series A no. 120, p. 59, para. - EGMR, 29.10.1992 - 14234/88
OPEN DOOR AND DUBLIN WELL WOMAN v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1992 - 12728/87
1 of the Rules of Court, it must be rejected as out of time (for recent authorities, see particularly the Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 42, para. 119; the Brozicek v. Italy judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, p. 15, para. 30; mutatis mutandis, the Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland judgment of 29 October 1992, Series A no. 246-A, p. 23, para. 46).
- EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76
GUZZARDI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1992 - 12728/87
However, the compass of the "case" is delimited not by the Commission's report but by its admissibility decision (see particularly the Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 39, para. 106; more recently, the Helmers v. Sweden judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-A, p. 13, para. 25). - EGMR, 29.10.1991 - 11826/85
HELMERS c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1992 - 12728/87
However, the compass of the "case" is delimited not by the Commission's report but by its admissibility decision (see particularly the Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 39, para. 106; more recently, the Helmers v. Sweden judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-A, p. 13, para. 25). - EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 10964/84
BROZICEK v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1992 - 12728/87
1 of the Rules of Court, it must be rejected as out of time (for recent authorities, see particularly the Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 42, para. 119; the Brozicek v. Italy judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, p. 15, para. 30; mutatis mutandis, the Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland judgment of 29 October 1992, Series A no. 246-A, p. 23, para. 46). - EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
TOMASI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1992 - 12728/87
1 of the Rules of Court, it must be rejected as out of time (for recent authorities, see particularly the Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 42, para. 119; the Brozicek v. Italy judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, p. 15, para. 30; mutatis mutandis, the Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland judgment of 29 October 1992, Series A no. 246-A, p. 23, para. 46).
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 23.09.2020 - C-83/19
Nach Auffassung von Generalanwalt Bobek verstoßen die vorläufige Ernennung des …
161 Vgl. EGMR, 25. November 1992, Abdoella/Niederlande (CE:ECHR:1992:1125JUD001272887, § 24). - Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 23.09.2020 - C-355/19
Asociatia "Forumul Judecatorilor din România" u.a. - Vorlage zur …
161 Vgl. EGMR, 25. November 1992, Abdoella/Niederlande (CE:ECHR:1992:1125JUD001272887, § 24). - Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 23.09.2020 - C-291/19
SO - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Vertrag über den Beitritt der Republik …
161 Vgl. EGMR, 25. November 1992, Abdoella/Niederlande (CE:ECHR:1992:1125JUD001272887, § 24).