Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 29.01.2003 - 54825/00
• EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 54825/00
• EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 54825/00
• EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 54825/00

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94

  Mord an James Bulger

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 54825/00

  It prohibits in absolute terms inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, among many other authorities, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 69, ECHR 1999-IX, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 54825/00

  It prohibits in absolute terms inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, among many other authorities, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 69, ECHR 1999-IX, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

  Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 54825/00

  However, it may take into account the fact that by 11 September 1997 the applicant had already been in custody for five months and three days (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 111, ECHR 2002-VI; Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553/99, §§ 56-58, ECHR 2002-VII).

 
• EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 54825/00

  However, the Court has consistently stressed that the suffering and humiliation involved must in any event go beyond that inevitable element of suffering or humiliation connected with a given form of legitimate treatment or punishment (see, mutatis mutandis, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, p. 15, § 30; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 39, § 100; V. v. the United Kingdom cited above, § 71).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 54825/00

  However, the Court has consistently stressed that the suffering and humiliation involved must in any event go beyond that inevitable element of suffering or humiliation connected with a given form of legitimate treatment or punishment (see, mutatis mutandis, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, p. 15, § 30; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 39, § 100; V. v. the United Kingdom cited above, § 71).
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64

  Wemhoff ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 54825/00

  The Court first recalls that, in determining the length of detention pending trial under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, the period to be taken into consideration begins on the day the accused is taken into custody and ends on the day when the charge is determined, even if only by a court of first instance (see, Wemhoff v. Germany, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 23, § 9).
• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 54825/00

  In other words, whether a remedy exists that could answer his complaints by providing a direct, speedy, and not merely indirect, protection of the rights guaranteed in the Convention (see Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 16, § 29).