Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 43449/02, 21475/04 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MILEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 09.10.2007 - 43449/02
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 43449/02, 21475/04
- EGMR, 10.07.2013 - 43449/02
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (21)
- EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 59909/00
GIACOMELLI c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 43449/02
In these circumstances, the complaint cannot be rejected for failure to exhaust domestic remedies (see, mutatis mutandis, López Ostra, cited above § 38; Giacomelli v. Italy (dec.), no. 59909/00, 15 March 2005; Ruano Morcuende v. Spain (dec.), no. 75287/01, 6 September 2005; and Oluic, cited above § 37).Those developments, coupled with the inordinate protraction of the proceedings for judicial review of that prohibition (instead of following a fast-track procedure as required by domestic law, for nearly two years the Sofia City Court barely managed to hold two hearings (see paragraphs 27, 34-36 and 53 in fine above)), prevented the applicants from obtaining effective protection of their rights (see, mutatis mutandis, Giacomelli v. Italy, no. 59909/00, §§ 93 and 94, ECHR 2006-XII, and Oluic, cited above, §§ 63-65).
- EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 1108/02
KOLEVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 46117/99
Taskin u.a. ./. Türkei - Umgehung einer rechtskräftigen Entscheidung der Justiz …
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 43449/02
The Court considers that the violation of Article 8 caused each of the applicants non-pecuniary damage which cannot, however, be precisely calculated (see, mutatis mutandis, Taskın and Others v. Turkey, no. 46117/99, § 144, ECHR 2004-X).
- EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 41604/98
Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens und der Wohnung (Einsatz von Durchsuchungen …
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 43449/02
Costs incurred to prevent or obtain redress for a violation of the Convention through the domestic legal order are recoverable under that provision (see, among other authorities, Buck v. Germany, no. 41604/98, § 66, ECHR 2005-IV, and, more recently, Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, § 159, 6 July 2010). - EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 194/02
NIKOLOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 51362/99
ENEVA AND DOBREV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 60036/00
BOGDANOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 73465/01
TZILEVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
VELIKOVI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 48380/99
TODOROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02
Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …
- EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 12605/03
LEON AND AGNIESZKA KANIA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 6538/74
SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1) (ARTICLE 50)
- EGMR, 06.02.1981 - 6289/73
AIREY c. IRLANDE (ARTICLE 50)
- EGMR, 22.05.2003 - 41666/98
KYRTATOS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 39561/98
ASHWORTH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 4143/02
MORENO GÓMEZ c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 26.02.2008 - 37664/04
FÄGERSKIÖLD v. SWEDEN
- EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 71146/01
BORYSIEWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
LÓPEZ OSTRA c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 27310/09
UDOVICIC v. CROATIA
Similarly, in the case of Mileva and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 43449/02 and 21475/04, 25 November 2010), comparable to the present case in that it concerned allegations of excessive noise from a computer club located in the same residential building as the applicants" and below their flat, the Court found, even without any noise tests being carried out at the domestic level, that the disturbance affecting the applicants" homes and their private and family lives reached the minimum level of severity under Article 8 of the Convention.