Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LARIONOVS AND TESS v. LATVIA

  Art. 6, Art. 7, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 04.01.2008 - 45520/04
• EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04, 19363/05
• EGMR - 45520/04

Wird zitiert von ... (14)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 22.11.1995 - 20190/92

  C.R. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04

  The criminal law must not be extensively construed to an accused's detriment, for example by analogy (see, for example, Kokkinakis v. Greece, judgment of 25 May 1993, no. 14307/88, paragraph 52 and C.R. v. The United Kingdom, judgment of 22 November 1995, no. 20190/92, paragraph 35).

  The law implies the legal norms that are accessible and foreseeable (see Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 23 June 1995, no 18139/91, paragraph 37 and C.R. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 November 1995, no 20190/92, paragraph 33).

• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04

  "Charge", for the purposes of Article 6 § 1, may be defined as "the official notification given to an individual by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence", a definition that also corresponds to the test whether "the situation of the [suspect] has been substantially affected" (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51, and McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 143, 10 September 2010).
• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04

  The cases of Malhous v. the Czech Republic ((dec.) [GC], no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII) and Deweer v. Belgium (27 February 1980, §§ 37-38, Series A no. 35) rendered their locus standi clear.

 
• EGMR, 08.03.2005 - 24790/04

  FAIRFIELD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04

  This is to be contrasted with cases in which the application is introduced after the victim's death, as in the cases on which the respondent Government relied (see Makri and Others and Biç and Others, both cited above, and also Fairfield v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24790/04, ECHR 2005-VI).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II; and, more recently, Zandbergs v. Latvia, no. 71092/01, § 87, 20 December 2011).
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

  Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 69, ECHR 2010; and, more recently, Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153/11, § 70, 25 March 2014).
• EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 71092/01

  ZANDBERGS v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II; and, more recently, Zandbergs v. Latvia, no. 71092/01, § 87, 20 December 2011).
• EGMR, 13.02.2003 - 36117/02

  GRISANKOVA et GRISANKOVS contre la LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04

  The Court has already examined the scope of the Constitutional Court's review in Latvia (see Grisankova and Grisankovs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 36117/02, ECHR 2003-II (extracts); Liepajnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no. 37586/06, §§ 73-76, 2 November 2010; Savics v. Latvia, no. 17892/03, §§ 113-17, 27 November 2012; Mihailovs v. Latvia, no. 35939/10, §§ 157-58, 22 January 2013; Nagla v. Latvia, no. 73469/10, § 48, 16 July 2013; and Latvijas jauno zemnieku apvieniba v. Latvia (dec.), no. 14610/05, §§ 44-45, 17 December 2013).
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 3843/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 69, ECHR 2010; and, more recently, Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153/11, § 70, 25 March 2014).
• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 37586/06

  LIEPAJNIEKS v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04

  The Court has already examined the scope of the Constitutional Court's review in Latvia (see Grisankova and Grisankovs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 36117/02, ECHR 2003-II (extracts); Liepajnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no. 37586/06, §§ 73-76, 2 November 2010; Savics v. Latvia, no. 17892/03, §§ 113-17, 27 November 2012; Mihailovs v. Latvia, no. 35939/10, §§ 157-58, 22 January 2013; Nagla v. Latvia, no. 73469/10, § 48, 16 July 2013; and Latvijas jauno zemnieku apvieniba v. Latvia (dec.), no. 14610/05, §§ 44-45, 17 December 2013).
• EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 14610/05

  LATVIJAS JAUNO ZEMNIEKU APVIENTBA v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

  TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 10511/10

  MURRAY c. PAYS-BAS

  45520/04 and 19363/05, § 172, 25 November 2014).
• EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 225/20

  DZIBUTI AND OTHERS v. LATVIA

  45520/04 and 19363/05, §§ 142-43 and 167, 25 November 2014).
• EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 8430/16

  JURGILEVICA AND POLAKOVS v. LATVIA

  45520/04 and 19363/05, §§ 142-43 and 167, 25 November 2014).

 
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 55089/13

  DORNEANU c. ROUMANIE

  Dans les cas où le requérant originaire décède après l'introduction de la requête, la Cour autorise normalement les proches de l'intéressé à poursuivre la procédure, à condition qu'ils aient un intérêt légitime à le faire (Malhous c. République tchèque (déc.) [GC], no 33071/96, CEDH 2000-XII, Larionovs et Tess c. Lettonie (déc.), nos 45520/04 et 19363/05, § 172, 25 novembre 2014, et Paposhvili c. Belgique [GC], no 41738/10, § 126, CEDH 2016).
• EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 56928/19

  VALIULLINA AND OTHERS v. LATVIA

  45520/04 and 19363/05, §§ 142-43 and 167, 25 November 2014).
• EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 13472/18

  COSOVAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  45520/04 and 19363/05, § 172, 25 November 2014; and Paposhvili v. Belgium [GC], no. 41738/10, § 126, ECHR 2016).
• EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 21698/08

  SOROCINSKIS v. LATVIA

  States are dispensed from answering before an international body for their acts before they have had an opportunity to put matters right through their own legal system (see Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no. 13216/05, § 115, ECHR 2015, and Larionovs and Tess v. Latvia (dec.), no. 45520/04, 25 November 2014).
• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 8741/15

  PASHKEVICH v. RUSSIA

  45520/04 and 19363/05, § 172, 25 November 2014).
• EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 49106/09

  VASILYADI v. RUSSIA

  45520/04 and 19363/05, § 172, 25 November 2014).
• EGMR, 02.04.2019 - 35198/13

  PERSTEINA v. LATVIA

  45520/04 and 19363/05, §§ 142 and 148, 25 November 2014).
• EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 5794/13

  S.N. AND T.D. v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 71569/14

  V.B. v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 11.04.2017 - 30474/03

  COSTACHE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 12646/15

  MAYLENSKIY v. RUSSIA