Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1993,10901
EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88 (https://dejure.org/1993,10901)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26.01.1993 - 14379/88 (https://dejure.org/1993,10901)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26. Januar 1993 - 14379/88 (https://dejure.org/1993,10901)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1993,10901) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (163)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

    Neumeister ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
    In this context regard must be had in particular to the character of the person involved, his morals, his assets, his links with the State in which he is being prosecuted and his international contacts (see, mutatis mutandis, the Neumeister v. Austria judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 39, para. 10).

    On the last of these dates in particular it acknowledged that the danger of absconding decreased as the length of detention increased, as already noted by the European Court (see, inter alia, the Neumeister judgment cited above, Series A no. 8, p. 39, para. 10).

    [ï?ª]ï?ª Neumeister v. Austria judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 37, para.

  • EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64

    Wemhoff ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
    As the Court has already found in the Wemhoff v. Germany judgment of 27 June 1968, the reasonableness of an accused person's continued detention must be assessed in each case according to its special features (Series A no. 7, p. 24, para. 10).

    It notes that the right of an accused in detention to have his case examined with particular expedition must not hinder the efforts of the courts to carry out their tasks with proper care (see among other authorities, mutatis mutandis, the Wemhoff and Tomasi judgments, cited above, Series A no. 7, p. 26, para. 17, and no. 241-A, p. 52, para. 102).

  • EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87

    TOMASI c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
    Where such grounds were "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see, as the most recent authority, the Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 35, para. 84).

    The Court points out that the danger of absconding cannot be gauged solely on the basis of the severity of the possible sentence; it must be assessed with reference to a number of other relevant factors which may either confirm the existence of a danger of absconding or make it appear so slight that it cannot justify pre-trial detention (see, as the most recent authority, the Tomasi judgment cited above, Series A no. 241-A, p. 37, para. 98).

  • EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 12718/87

    CLOOTH v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
    In the long term, however, the requirements of the investigation no longer suffice - even in such a case - to justify such detention: in the normal course of events the risks alleged diminish with the passing of time as inquiries are effected, statements taken and verifications carried out (see the Clooth v. Belgium judgment of 12 December 1991, Series A no. 225, p. 16, para. 43).
  • EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 1602/62

    Stögmüller ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
    That case-law in fact states that the reasonable time cannot be assessed in abstracto (see, mutatis mutandis, the Stögmüller v. Austria judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9, p. 40, para. 4).
  • EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

    Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair

    However, the "reasonable time" cannot be assessed in abstracto: "continued detention can be justified... only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest,... which outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty" (see W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, § 30).
  • EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 14305/17

    Menschenrechtsgerichtshof fordert Freilassung von Selahattin Demirtas

    As regards the risk of flight, the Court has held that it must be assessed with reference to a number of other factors, such as the accused's character, morals, assets, links with the jurisdiction, and international contacts (see W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, § 33 Series A no. 254-A; Smirnova, cited above, § 60; and Buzadji, cited above, § 90).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    La poursuite de l'incarcération ne se justifie, dans une espèce donnée, que si des indices concrets révèlent une véritable exigence d'intérêt public prévalant, nonobstant la présomption d'innocence, sur la règle du respect de la liberté individuelle (voir, entre autres, l'arrêt W. c. Suisse du 26 janvier 1993, série A n° 254-A, p. 15, § 30).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht