Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 39921/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2013,30973
EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 39921/03 (https://dejure.org/2013,30973)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26.03.2013 - 39921/03 (https://dejure.org/2013,30973)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26. März 2013 - 39921/03 (https://dejure.org/2013,30973)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,30973) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99

    MAJEWSKI v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 39921/03
    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Abramiuc v. Romania, no. 37411/02, § 103-109, 24 February 2009; and Matica v. Romania, no. 19567/02, § 24, 2 November 2006).
  • EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 19567/02

    MATICA v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 39921/03
    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Abramiuc v. Romania, no. 37411/02, § 103-109, 24 February 2009; and Matica v. Romania, no. 19567/02, § 24, 2 November 2006).
  • EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 56026/00

    WENDE AND KUKOWKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 39921/03
    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Abramiuc v. Romania, no. 37411/02, § 103-109, 24 February 2009; and Matica v. Romania, no. 19567/02, § 24, 2 November 2006).
  • EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

    SULWINSKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 39921/03
    To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03).
  • EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 37411/02

    ABRAMIUC c. ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 39921/03
    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Abramiuc v. Romania, no. 37411/02, § 103-109, 24 February 2009; and Matica v. Romania, no. 19567/02, § 24, 2 November 2006).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 39921/03
    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Abramiuc v. Romania, no. 37411/02, § 103-109, 24 February 2009; and Matica v. Romania, no. 19567/02, § 24, 2 November 2006).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht