Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROMAN v. ROMANIA

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
  Struck out of the list (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ROMAN v. ROMANIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 4140/04
• EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4140/04

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

  SULWINSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4140/04

  To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).
• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 3048/04

  RICCARDI v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4140/04

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Articles 3 and 6 of the Convention on account of the conditions of the applicant's detention, lack of adequate medical treatment and excessive length of proceedings (see, for example, Riccardi v. Romania, no. 3048/04, 3 April 2012, Lautaru v. Romania, no. 13099/04, 18 October 2011, Flamînzeanu v. Romania, no. 56664/08, 12 April 2011, Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, 1 June 2010, and Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, ECHR-2009 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 25867/03

  IAMANDI c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4140/04

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Articles 3 and 6 of the Convention on account of the conditions of the applicant's detention, lack of adequate medical treatment and excessive length of proceedings (see, for example, Riccardi v. Romania, no. 3048/04, 3 April 2012, Lautaru v. Romania, no. 13099/04, 18 October 2011, Flamînzeanu v. Romania, no. 56664/08, 12 April 2011, Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, 1 June 2010, and Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, ECHR-2009 (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 6586/03

  BRANDUSE c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4140/04

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Articles 3 and 6 of the Convention on account of the conditions of the applicant's detention, lack of adequate medical treatment and excessive length of proceedings (see, for example, Riccardi v. Romania, no. 3048/04, 3 April 2012, Lautaru v. Romania, no. 13099/04, 18 October 2011, Flamînzeanu v. Romania, no. 56664/08, 12 April 2011, Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, 1 June 2010, and Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, ECHR-2009 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 56664/08

  FLAMÎNZEANU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4140/04

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Articles 3 and 6 of the Convention on account of the conditions of the applicant's detention, lack of adequate medical treatment and excessive length of proceedings (see, for example, Riccardi v. Romania, no. 3048/04, 3 April 2012, Lautaru v. Romania, no. 13099/04, 18 October 2011, Flamînzeanu v. Romania, no. 56664/08, 12 April 2011, Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, 1 June 2010, and Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, ECHR-2009 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 13099/04

  LAUTARU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4140/04

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Articles 3 and 6 of the Convention on account of the conditions of the applicant's detention, lack of adequate medical treatment and excessive length of proceedings (see, for example, Riccardi v. Romania, no. 3048/04, 3 April 2012, Lautaru v. Romania, no. 13099/04, 18 October 2011, Flamînzeanu v. Romania, no. 56664/08, 12 April 2011, Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, 1 June 2010, and Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, ECHR-2009 (extracts)).