Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 72950/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,5781) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZBOROWSKI v. POLAND
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
RUTKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 72950/13
RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 15. A detailed description of the relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for excessive length of judicial proceedings - in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act - are presented in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland ((dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V), Ratajczyk v. Poland ((dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-VIII), and in its judgments in the cases of Krasuski v. Poland (no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V) and, most recently, Rutkowski and Others v. Poland (nos. 72287/10, 13927/11 and 46187/11, §§ 75-107, 7 July 2015).On the latter point, account must also be taken of what is at stake for the applicant (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 124, ECHR 2000-XI; for further case-law references, see Rutkowski and Others v. Poland, nos. 72287/10, 13927/11 and 46187/11, §§ 126-28, 7 July 2015).
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 72950/13
RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 15. A detailed description of the relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for excessive length of judicial proceedings - in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act - are presented in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland ((dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V), Ratajczyk v. Poland ((dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-VIII), and in its judgments in the cases of Krasuski v. Poland (no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V) and, most recently, Rutkowski and Others v. Poland (nos. 72287/10, 13927/11 and 46187/11, §§ 75-107, 7 July 2015). - EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 24846/94
ZIELINSKI ET PRADAL & GONZALEZ ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 72950/13
To exclude the periods when the case was examined by the highest domestic jurisdiction from the overall period to be taken into account by the Court would run counter to the manner in which the Court has so far approached this issue (see, among many other authorities, Gossa v. Poland, no. 47986/99, §§ 68 and 71, 9 January 2007; Metzger v. Germany, no. 37591/97, § 34, 31 May 2001; and Zielinski and Pradal & Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846/94 and 34165/96 to 34173/96, § 64, ECHR 1999-VII). - EGMR, 31.05.2001 - 37591/97
Deutschland verurteilt: Verstoß gegen Recht auf faires Verfahren wegen zu langer …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 72950/13
To exclude the periods when the case was examined by the highest domestic jurisdiction from the overall period to be taken into account by the Court would run counter to the manner in which the Court has so far approached this issue (see, among many other authorities, Gossa v. Poland, no. 47986/99, §§ 68 and 71, 9 January 2007; Metzger v. Germany, no. 37591/97, § 34, 31 May 2001; and Zielinski and Pradal & Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846/94 and 34165/96 to 34173/96, § 64, ECHR 1999-VII).