Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 20570/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,13101) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A.I. AND OTHERS v. DENMARK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 29217/12
Rückführung einer afghanischen Familie nach Italien konventionskonform?
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 20570/14
On 4 November 2014 the Court delivered its judgment in Tarakhel v. Switzerland ([GC], no. 29217/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), which concerned the compatibility of the removal of asylum seekers to Italy with the respondent State's obligations under Article 3 of the Convention.The relevant European and Italian law, instruments, principles and practice in respect of asylum proceedings, reception of asylum-seekers and transfer of asylum-seekers under the Dublin Regulation have recently been summarised in Tarakhel v. Switzerland ([GC], no. 29217/12, §§ 28-48, 4 November 2014).
- EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80
ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 20570/14
The Court reiterates that Contracting States have the right, as a matter of well-established international law and subject to their treaty obligations, including the Convention, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see, for example, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 34, § 67; Boujlifa v. France, judgment of 21 October 1997, § 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI; and Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII).