Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PAUWELS c. BELGIQUE

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'Art. 5-3 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PAUWELS v. BELGIUM

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-3 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 08.07.1985 - 10208/82
• EGMR, 26.05.1988 - 10208/82

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83

  BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.1988 - 10208/82

  The Court notes that its judgments leave to the State concerned the choice of the means to be used in its domestic legal system to give effect to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) (see, as the most recent authority and mutatis mutandis, the Belilos judgment of 29 April 1988, Series A no. 132, p. 33, § 78).

  An award may be made under Article 50 (art. 50) in respect of costs and expenses that (a) were actually and necessarily incurred by the injured party in order to seek, through the domestic legal system, prevention or rectification of a violation, to have the same established by the Commission and later by the Court and to obtain redress therefor; and (b) are reasonable as to quantum (see, among many other authorities, the Belilos judgment previously cited, Series A no. 132, p. 33, § 79).

• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.1988 - 10208/82

  That being so, his impartiality was capable of appearing to be open to doubt (see, mutatis mutandis, the Piersack judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53, p. 16, § 31, and the De Cubber judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86, p. 16, § 30).
• EGMR, 27.11.1987 - 9976/82

  BEN YAACOUB v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.1988 - 10208/82

  With reference to the Ben Yaacoub judgment of 27 November 1987 (Series A no. 127-A, pp. 8-9, § 15), they asked the Court, finally, to hold that there had been a clear reversal of Belgian case-law and that, accordingly, the problem to which the case gave rise appeared henceforth no longer to subsist in Belgium.

 
• EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79

  DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.1988 - 10208/82

  On the first point - independence of the parties - Mr. Pauwels referred to the Court's case-law (de Jong, Baljet and van den Brink judgment and van der Sluijs, Zuiderveld and Klappe judgment, both of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 24, § 49, and no. 78, p. 19, § 44, respectively) and put forward two arguments.
• EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79

  PIERSACK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.1988 - 10208/82

  That being so, his impartiality was capable of appearing to be open to doubt (see, mutatis mutandis, the Piersack judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53, p. 16, § 31, and the De Cubber judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86, p. 16, § 30).
• EGMR, 04.12.1979 - 7710/76

  Schiesser ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.1988 - 10208/82

  However, as a consequence of the Schiesser judgment given by the European Court of Human Rights on 4 December 1979 (Series A no. 34), the auditeur général issued the following instructions on 29 March 1983 (Circular no. 2920):.