Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ESAT BAYRAM v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 2 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 75535/01

  The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (with regard to autopsies, see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 106, ECHR 2000-VII; concerning witnesses, for example, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; and concerning forensic evidence, for example, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 75535/01

  The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (with regard to autopsies, see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 106, ECHR 2000-VII; concerning witnesses, for example, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; and concerning forensic evidence, for example, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000).
• EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93

  GÜL v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 75535/01

  The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (with regard to autopsies, see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 106, ECHR 2000-VII; concerning witnesses, for example, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; and concerning forensic evidence, for example, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000).

 
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 75535/01

  Nonetheless, where allegations are made under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 336, and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 283, ECHR 2001-VII) even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place.
• EGMR, 07.06.2005 - 40145/98

  KILINÇ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 75535/01

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its previous judgments, concerning deaths occurring during compulsory military service (see, in particular, Abdullah Yılmaz, cited above, §§ 55-58, Kılınç and Others v. Turkey, no. 40145/98, §§ 40-43, 7 June 2005, Salgın, cited above, §§ 76-78, and Ataman v. Turkey, no. 46252/99, §§ 54-56, 27 April 2006).
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 75535/01

  The obligation to carry out an effective investigation into unlawful or suspicious deaths is well-established in the Court's case law (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, §§ 110-113, ECHR 2005-VII).
• EGMR, 27.04.2006 - 46252/99

  ATAMAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 75535/01

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its previous judgments, concerning deaths occurring during compulsory military service (see, in particular, Abdullah Yılmaz, cited above, §§ 55-58, Kılınç and Others v. Turkey, no. 40145/98, §§ 40-43, 7 June 2005, Salgın, cited above, §§ 76-78, and Ataman v. Turkey, no. 46252/99, §§ 54-56, 27 April 2006).
• EGMR, 19.10.2006 - 56154/00

  YILDIRIM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 75535/01

  Though the Court is not bound by the findings of domestic courts, in normal circumstances it requires cogent elements to lead it to depart from the findings of fact reached by those courts (see Selim Yıldırım and Others v. Turkey, no. 56154/00, § 59, 19 October 2006).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 75535/01

  Nonetheless, where allegations are made under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 336, and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 283, ECHR 2001-VII) even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place.

• EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 6978/08

  GHEORGHE COBZARU c. ROUMANIE

  Le Gouvernement estime que la somme demandée par le requérant est excessive et renvoie à la jurisprudence de la Cour dans des affaires similaires à ses yeux (Maiorano et autres c. Italie, no 28634/06, § 251, 15 décembre 2009 ; Trufin c. Roumanie, no 3990/04, § 57, 20 octobre 2009 ; Dvorácek et Dvorácková c. Slovaquie, no 30754/04, § 100, 28 juillet 2009 ; Esat Bayram c. Turquie, no 75535/01, § 60, 26 mai 2009, et Sandru c. Roumanie, no 22465/03, § 89, 8 décembre 2009).
• EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 35403/06

  TSINTSABADZE v. GEORGIA

  While the obligation to investigate relates only to the means to be employed and there is no absolute right to obtain a prosecution or conviction, any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its capability of establishing the circumstances of the case or the person responsible is liable to fall foul of the required measure of effectiveness (see Esat Bayram v. Turkey, no. 75535/01, § 47, 26 May 2009, and Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-VI).
• EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 12773/03

  PANKOV v. BULGARIA

  Such investigation must comply with certain minimum requirements which have recently been restated, with reference to lethal incidents in the armed forces, in paragraph 47 of the Court's judgment in the case of Esat Bayram v. Turkey (no. 75535/01, 26 May 2009).